Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/07/2023 4:35:53 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

she might be SCOTUS material folks.


2 posted on 08/07/2023 5:06:32 PM PDT by imabadboy99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Later reading


4 posted on 08/07/2023 5:13:31 PM PDT by Chgogal (Welcome to Fuhrer Biden's Weaponized Fascist Banana Republic! It's the road to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It appears that the judge doesn’t care for Jack Smith’s little sh!t-show.


5 posted on 08/07/2023 5:17:34 PM PDT by 2111USMC (Aim Small Miss Small)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Why would the DOJ want to keep the evidence away from Americans? Jack Smith claims it is clear as the light of day that Trump has endangered the nation.

The reason is, of course, there is no evidence.


8 posted on 08/07/2023 7:20:41 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Dems want this judge thrown out.


13 posted on 08/07/2023 9:47:28 PM PDT by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson