Posted on 08/07/2023 11:23:10 AM PDT by Kevin in California
Was it a DC Federal Judge by any chance.
What a shocker. This judge is an Obama appointed.
Judith Miller again.
I don’t believe she has to real her sources. She’ll go to jail first. Too bad the thugs and goons who write for the New Hore Times and Washington Post won’t stand with her...
I don’t believe she has to real her sources. She’ll go to jail first. Too bad the thugs and goons who write for the New York Times and Washington Post won’t stand with her...
The answer should be “creditable source” unless the source wants to come forward. The reporter is a reporter not a copy reader. We have seen this before and refusing is the way to get a hearing in front of a higher court. This reporter has 30 years of experience in DC, she will be a Ledgen if sent to the DC lockup.
Another appointed Obama Judge doing what he is ordered to do.
How is this "need" established under the law?
Since when did the FBI give a damn about leaking information that "violates the privacy act"????
Trump would have a field day if the FBI were ever held accountable for such a violation.
IIRC, she donated part of her liver to one of her children who had an otherwise fatal liver disease. I don't know whether that child still lives and whether it would have significant medical needs which putting her in jail might compromise. She's one of the few good ones. I hope this can be appealed. From what I've previously read on this I don't understand what it is about this case which warrants trumping her 1st amendment rights. Perhaps we have two similarly foundational rights clashing here and and by comparison her rights rank like "calling fire in a crowded theater." If so the reasoning could be better explained.
To sweat the truth out of her they will threaten to force her to go on a date with Adam Schiff.
Or like Woody Allen in Take the Money and Run, being sentenced to the punishment of listening to an insurance salesman.
Now Deep State is getting their revenge on Herridge.
No matter what, she’s totally not guilty. Someone was bound to say it sooner or later.
Yep. That's the first thing that popped into my head.
A democrat ‘judge’ would love to damage a decent and fair journalist - even better that she’s the mother of a child who might die without her.
That ‘judge’ will go moist with the thrill of her own evil... that’s how ‘justice’ works in a hellhole. Thugs at the DOJ will stand up and clap. I guess we’re lucky the witch can’t put Catherine Herridge in a rat infested DC jail to be tortured and/or put in solitary for weeks... oh, wait...
Oh, and Herridge doesn’t have ‘first amendment rights’ in this situation. Decent and brave journalists have been jailed before... but because she’s not a liberal the ‘justice’ system will hurt and damage her.
Catherine Herridge used to be the best of the best (not sure what kinds of restrictions are on her @CBS.
The Chinee want names so they can have their goons make accidents happen, chop-chop.
What First Amendment?
He’s about 12 now and cancer-free as of a 2022 report.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.