YOu’re wrong.
A strawman is something unrelated to the meat of the discussion, a non-sequitur, something not actually put forth by the other side.
Your mention of Stew Peters and tying him to the (fictituous) “QAnon” — there is Q and there are Anons, there is no QAnon — as well as the misstatement that the jabs (which are not vaccines, the definition of vaccine was changed retroactively by the Pfauci-ites) “are derived from snake venom” (when in fact the actual assertion is that there are elements of the genetic sequence in the jabs which among other things, code for certain amino acid sequences found in snake venom)_to turn recipients into a “hybrid of Satan” (I never saw that suggested anywhere).
Not just lies on your part, but word salad on the order of Fetterman, Biden, or Kamala, and all with the hope of throwing anything at the wall and hoping you can scare people away from ever considering anything contrary to the narrative of “Safe and Effective and should be mandatory and injected over and over and over”.
And if you read the Q threads you troll, you will find at most very little mention of Yanowitz, and not reliance on those supposed findings: to the point that I don’t even remember seeing that name mentioned.
And again, utter dishonesty on your part, to try to pretend that the names you quote are the primary and representative sources of objections to the clot shots.
While you are VERY consistent, in seldom mentioning either the names or findings of real opposition to the clot shots mentioned on these threads.
You should have been banned for trolling long ago.
grey_whiskers wrote: “A strawman is something unrelated to the meat of the discussion, a non-sequitur, something not actually put forth by the other side.”
Once the author of that article brought Peters and the rest into this argument, comments demonstrating his relationship to Q and other conspiracy theories is justified and cannot be considered a strawman.
grey_whiskers wrote: “You should have been banned for trolling long ago.”
You sound just like a liberal trying to ban any disagreements with your anti-vaxxer narrative.
It’s like the discussion FReepers had about Graphene Oxide.
It took me less than 5 minutes to find out there were 8 manufacturers of Graphene Oxide. The very first one I pulled up mentioned medical use.
And if you read the Q threads you troll
Extraordinary how you contradict yourself, since QAnon has been mentioned on virtually every one of those posts, including the original material posted by the original poster of those threads. "Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump administration." And you have been here since 2004, so you would know full well those threads in the very title were once called the "QAnon" threads for a very long period of time. Yet you sit here and make these claims, while calling the person you are talking to "dishonest". How do you explain this?