Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge tells Trump to respond to DOJ protective order by Monday
Washington Examiner ^ | August 5, 2023 | Cami Mondeaux

Posted on 08/05/2023 2:20:55 PM PDT by ConservativeInPA

A federal judge issued a ruling ordering Donald Trump to respond to a protective order filed by the Justice Department that would block the former president from sharing details of evidence from his Jan. 6 criminal case proceedings.

In a court order filed Saturday afternoon, Judge Tanya Chutkan ruled Trump's legal team must respond to the special counsel's motion by Monday at 5 p.m. The order comes after the DOJ issued a court filing at about 10 p.m. on Friday, calling attention to a message Trump posted on his Truth Social account that prosecutors say raises concerns the former president may improperly share details about his latest criminal proceedings.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: chutkan; donatedonaldtrump; donatetrump; gag; obamajudge; obamastooge; rolandfreisler; smith; tanyachutkan; tanyaschutkan; tanyastoogechutkan; tds; trump; trumppersecution; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: ConservativeInPA

Who’s being Custodial Interrogated in exchange for Immunity?


41 posted on 08/05/2023 4:51:23 PM PDT by Varsity Flight ( See"War by🙏🙏 the prophesies set before you." I Timothy 1:18. Nazarite prayer warriors. 10.5.6.5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA
Years ago my friend asked his lawyer whether he should complain about his company's policies. The lawyer responded (sounding like Algonquin J. Calhoun from Amos and Andy):

"That might exasperate the situation."

42 posted on 08/05/2023 7:38:10 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: srmanuel

Shouldn’t that apply to the prosecution as well? Speaking of influencing the jury pool?


43 posted on 08/05/2023 7:40:33 PM PDT by moonhawk (Unleash the MAGAhideen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: moonhawk

It probably will apply to both sides even though the prosecution will leak information they are not posting on social media


44 posted on 08/05/2023 10:30:47 PM PDT by srmanuel ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA

This order shows collusion between prosecution and the corrupt judge.


45 posted on 08/05/2023 10:33:19 PM PDT by antceecee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

My point which we agree on is gag orders are not considered a violation of a defendant’s 1st amendment rights as many seem to believe

In this matter Trump is his on worst enemy and whatever he says can be used against him and and probably will


46 posted on 08/05/2023 10:33:28 PM PDT by srmanuel ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA

Poor Jack Smith. You need another layer of skin (a thick one this time).

But no. He’ll get a biased Obama federal judge to staple President Trumps mouth shut so there’s no dissent.


47 posted on 08/06/2023 4:37:39 AM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.for corruptiion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA

Thè only way that can actually happen is to withhold the check, in which case, there’s a personal penalty most people arent willing to pay. Not to mention other shortfalls in necessary services. And then it would take till next year before most of those checks would be written, and another year before budget committee tries to budget the lack.

I’d like to see the states withhold. There are supposed to be 50 sovereign states, each with power and authority of their own. It won’t happen, but your thought is a good one.


48 posted on 08/06/2023 6:31:34 AM PDT by PrairieLady2 (USA: Land of the free, Because of the Brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA

Isn’t it everyone is guilty until they prove their innocence?

/\

In the old aristocrat rule
( that USA kicked out in 1776 )

It was

And is now again

under the new neo feudal lords.


49 posted on 08/06/2023 7:38:36 AM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA

Tanya Chutkan Judge Roy bean in black and breasts.


50 posted on 08/06/2023 8:17:42 AM PDT by Vaduz (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson