The author seems to be deliberately blurring the distinction between two different courses of action. Just because VP Pence stated that he would allow objections to state electoral votes to be heard in Congress, it doesn’t mean he’s acknowledging that he had the authority to reject those EVs outright or even just “send them back for review.”
Boy, thats a stretch on your part. There would be no reason to hear them if they were not actionable.
Yea, and think of all the Trump corruption the Mueller investigation rooted out. The man is totally corrupt, and not just Jack Smith, Adam Schiff has the proof too.
Really why have the preview to review if you Ave to power to action?... kind of stupid and the founding father’s were not stupid.. the wrote check and balances for everything including election fraud...
Or do you content they never considered that a state could have a fraudulent election or delegates or there a dispute in the state?
Of course he had the authority, just not the balls.
Swing states’ executives enacted voting changes without complying with their own state laws — like running those changes thru their legislature. That is a violation of the US Constitution. That makes the Electors from those states invalid — automatically.
If a Veep says he does not have the authority to enforce the US Const — he has been bought. Pence is a traitor.
So you’re saying Pence’s earlier comments were meaningless bs, made to fool people.