Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MtnClimber

The goal seems to be disruption. Besides, green energy is not green.


2 posted on 08/02/2023 6:43:04 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MtnClimber

The goal is smart meters...total control of your energy and total control of the sources themselves.


3 posted on 08/02/2023 6:45:43 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

The goal is population reduction and imposing misery on the populace via energy shortages and out of control energy costs when the grid is working.


29 posted on 08/02/2023 7:23:00 AM PDT by MTBobcat (The “rank-and-file” are as corrupted as their leadership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

All credible and honest utility executives need to be consistently and continuously informing their boards, regulators, investors and customers of the risks associated with the unrealistic “transition” to renewables. The risks of significantly reduced reliability and increasing costs are very real and absolutely predictable. Despite uninformed politicians rhetoric, unachievable promises and absurd targets, the utility executives that just keep playing the green energy game and aren’t raising the red flags consistently will be the ones that are held accountable when the lights go out. All the John Kerry’s, Greta’s, climate activists, tree huggers, and IPCC, etc. will be silent about their deceit and lies, but along with the crooked politicians, will be pointing the finger of blame at the utility executives for failing in their responsibilities. American society cannot survive on fairy dust, unicorn farts, and dreams of total renewables for electric power supply. Base load sourcing of nuclear, natural gas and coal is essential.


51 posted on 08/02/2023 9:00:34 AM PDT by Smnz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Green energy is not only not green;it’s also inadequate. It should never supplant conventional energy production until it is proven that it can. Personally, I don’t think that will ever happen with current systems. They have adequate proof of this, at the present state of the art. I can see “green energy” only useful as an optional power source where standard power sources might not be enough in emergency conditions.


71 posted on 08/02/2023 7:36:53 PM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Green energy is not only not green;it’s also inadequate. It should never supplant conventional energy production until it is proven that it can. Personally, I don’t think that will ever happen with current systems. They have adequate proof of this, at the present state of the art. I can see “green energy” only useful as an optional power source where standard power sources might not be enough in emergency conditions.


72 posted on 08/02/2023 7:37:50 PM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson