Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fido969
That's based on the naturalization act of 1804, superseded by the opinion in Dred Scott and the 14th amendment.

That was published in 1817. It was a widely used lawbook in the state of Pennsylvania, and it's second addition was published in 1847.

It was based on the work of the Pennsylvania Supreme court, the members of which all had connections to either creating the US Constitution or ratifying it, in determining what English laws would no longer apply in Pennsylvania.

They undertook the task of weighing the English common laws and statutes as a result of the Pennsylvania legislature ordering them to clarify the issue of what parts of the common law would still remain in effect in Pennsylvania.

The point here is that people who actually knew what they were talking about were the source for this information.

363 posted on 07/28/2023 6:56:08 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

Of course something published in 1817 would rely on the naturalization act of 1804. It would not, however, consider the 14th amendment.

The 14th clarified prior treatment of the citizenship issue. As such, it is now the law of the land.


370 posted on 07/28/2023 7:43:20 AM PDT by Fido969 (45 is Superman! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson