Why would the prosecution (DoJ) agree to such a flawed plea agreement? It was totally one sided (in favor of Hunter).
The DoJ got nothing from it other than to end the trial.
The one thing they did “get” on, second thought, is a delay in the outcome. I've read there is a statute of limitations coming in October for the crimes Hunter is alleged.
If the DoJ’s acceptance of such flawed plea deal is not indication how corrupt and or incompetent they are, there isn't any better indicator.
Statue of limitations does not run out under pending charges, it does run out of charges the prosecution did not bring yet. Wonder who is running money into the democratic political state today, hunter and joe to much heat, bill and hilly CGI are out.
I would suspect the media quite party center democrats are making out like bandits with deals from out of nowhere. Always wondered where all the Dem donations came from, they have the market cornered on street hustlers, they now have board members everywhere.
The statute of limitations does not expire in October. Under RICO, the staute doesn’t expire until 10 years after the last predicate act. Wire fraud is one of them.
In addition, conspiracies to obstruct justice has no statute of limitations; and, the SOL restarts every day.
IIRC...Statutes of limitations get extended by a case being “active”.