Posted on 07/25/2023 9:02:02 AM PDT by Heartlander
Just how untethered to the rule of law did the United States come during the Covid response?
Before March 2020, most Americans would think that monitoring church attendance, banning Easter services, and arresting hymn singers were practices reserved for Eastern-style totalitarianism. The Soviet Union persecuted Christians and the Chinese have Muslim concentration camps, but Americans’ freedom of worship is enshrined in the Bill of Rights.
The free exercise of religion precedes all other liberties in the First Amendment. It was born of a core conviction that the New World could do it better than the Old World of religious wars and persecution. Freedom, the Founders believed, would not diminish religious experience but rather bolster it through toleration and peace. This was a radical conviction at the time, a dramatic departure from centuries and millennia of costly struggle.
Government guaranteed everyone’s religious liberty. And the system worked. Religious conviction did not diminish but rather intensified throughout the 19th century. Most governments in the world followed similar guarantees never to interfere with religious practice. Even in the 21st century, when the country in general had become increasingly secular, few could imagine that political leaders would launch a crusade against organized religion.
Yet that’s exactly what happened. As the Covid creed emerged as the national faith, the American tradition of religious pluralism withered away. Freedom of worship was replaced by widespread demands for conformity.
This wasn’t limited to the devoutly godless shores of Marin County or East Hampton. Christians in Idaho recently reached a $300,000 settlement with a local city after they were arrested for attending outdoor church services in September 2020. Christ Church Pastor Ben Zornes organized the worship. “We were just singing songs,” he explained at the time.
The local police chief had no patience for the violation of corona law. “At some point in time you have to enforce,” he told the press after arresting attendees at the “psalm sing.”
But did they have to enforce the orders? Was arresting Christians legally required, or was it an explicit violation of the First Amendment?
The arrested worshippers sued the city for the violations of their constitutional rights. In February, US District Judge Morrison England Jr. denied the city’s motion to dismiss.
“Somehow, every single official involved overlooked the exclusionary language [of constitutionally protected behavior] in the Ordinance,” Judge England wrote. “The Plaintiffs should never have been arrested in the first place.”
The obviousness of that statement – worshippers should never have been arrested for singing outdoors – reveals the intensity of the secular fervor that swept the country.
Covid not only supplanted organized religion, it usurped the United States Constitution. Politicians and jurists invented a pandemic exception for American liberties. Citizens suddenly lost their rights to freedom of speech, freedom to travel, freedom from surveillance, and more. Religious groups suffered ongoing targeting.
In New York, Governor Andrew Cuomo banned “drive-in” religious services. In California, the Santa Clara Health Department used GPS data to monitor attendance at a local church. In Kentucky, state police recorded congregants’ license plates and issued warnings for attending Easter service.
A thirst for power may explain the actions of governors and bureaucrats, but only madness can explain why policemen arrested worshippers and how neighbors called authorities on fellow Christians to report their insubordination.
“Mass formation is, in essence, a kind of group hypnosis that destroys individuals’ ethical self-awareness and robs them of their ability to think critically,” Mattias Desmet writes in The Psychology of Totalitarianism. “The message is clear: the individual must at all times show that he submits to the interest of the collective, by performing self-destructive, symbolic (ritualistic) behaviors.”
And as the group lost its ability to think critically, Christians in this case lost their right to worship. So too did Jews, Muslims, and every other person of faith that gathered with others in prayer and praise.
The rule of law gave way to the capricious whims of panic. Governors and mayors embraced new powers to control their citizens. The Covid creed emerged and divided society between the heretics and the obedient, the lepers and the cleansed, the sinners and the saints.
The case in Idaho allows us to reflect on two things. First, the case shows how fear and hysteria led Americans to abandon their ethical self-awareness and capacity for critical thinking. Second, it offers a glimmer of hope that we can create accountability and demand justice for the campaign against human liberty.
This assumes they were critical thinkers to begin with.
Could have gotten 2 million if they were a black teacher who failed their competency tests for decades.
Should have been $300k EACH.
Split how many ways?
Yup.
Now, I understand this isn't EVERY local police chief, and I'm sure he seemed like a nice, regular-type guy. Until he wasn't.
"Christians in Idaho recently reached a $300,000 settlement with a local city after they were arrested for attending outdoor church services in September 2020."
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Patriots beware! Politically correct interpretations of the Constitution are a loose cannon.
First, have a look at Section 1 of the 14th Amendment (14A).
"Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Section 1 begs the question if the Bill of Rights (BoR) had applied to the states before 14A was ratified. And the truth is that the drafters of the BoR had decided that the states did not have to respect the rights that they had protected with the BoR. The states obligated only the new, untrusted federal government to respect BoR protections.
In fact, regardless what FDR's state sovereignty-ignoring justices wanted everybody to think about "atheist" Thomas Jefferson's infamous "wall of separation" when they scandalously kicked G-d out of the public schools, the real Thomas Jefferson had clarified the following.
Jefferson had used the 10th Amendment (10A) to explain the otherwise obvious conclusion concerning 10A and government powers to cultivate religious expression, that the colonies had reserved such powers uniquely to the states regardless that they had made 1A to prohibit such powers entirely to Congress. (The corrupt Congress that needs to be primaried in 2024 easily bypasses its 1A prohibitions by letting activist judges get away with legislating anti-religious expression, anti-free speech laws from the bench.)
Getting back to the 1A abridgment settlement, by saying that the city compensated abridgment of religious expression, does that mean that city officials who allegedly abridged religious expression paid the compensation from their personal bank accounts (I don't think so), or did taxpayers ultimately pay the compensation, and will continue to do so in such cases all over the nation, effectively nullifying 14A protections imo?
Regarding 1st Amendment freedoms, that's in the Constitution, not in the Holy Bible. In fact, the angel Gabriel struck John the Baptist's father Zechariah mute when he hardened his heart at the altar of incense to Gabriel's good news from G-d about John.
In fact, Romans 13:1 says that G-d has established all authority. So by having worship service despite corona law, did the pastor and his congregation likewise harden their hearts and put G-d to the test, G-d “speaking” through the local police chief?
“In fact, Romans 13:1 says that G-d has established all authority.”
Jesus also told us “render unto Caesar’s what is Caesar’s, and render unto God what is God’s”. Worship belongs to God, not to Caesar.
My problem with this is it comes out of taxpayer pockets. The officials who violated the constitutional rights of citizens should be paying out of their OWN pockets, & they should be required to resign from their positions. How can they hold elected office when they clearly don’t understand how things are supposed to work in this country?!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.