Replies

He went back because he was passionate about people. I can understand how this would disturb him greatly and lead him to be unable to cope with the world he was living in and the world he left behind. The session was designed to shake and attack white people. That they used him as their example had to destroy his sense of who he was along with destroying a professional reputation he’d been building for years. Didn’t matter that he won his case, he was subjected to targeted retaliation being unable to get another contract. His victory was pyrrhic and he was destroyed personally and professionally. He was sixty. Men are very much about their reputations and their work.

The whole point of these sessions isn’t to raise consciousness or help people be more understanding. It’s to inflict pain on them. It’s to make them question what they know about themselves and their character. It’s to make them villains for the color of their skin. It’s revenge. He thought he was a person of good moral character, he’d been told as much and admired by his profession only to have it turn around and tell him he was actually fundamentally evil and a threat to minorities just by existing. The DEI grift has to take a fast train to the ash heap of history to protect a free society.

Think about this, we have people who are indoctrinated as victims all their lives by their own communities thanks or grievance prophets and opportunistic politicians now profiting on spreading that victimization to the larger society rather than cleaning up their communities and rejecting the premise that they are less than, unable to achieve and can only get ahead through a hustle. Just think this through. It’s a cancer.

Unfortunately it’s done considerable damage to the fabric of society. Just the other day, I witnessed a young mixed-raced hair stylist struggling to figure out how to refer to her client (who presented herself like lesbian woman have for decades) when talking to colleagues after the client left. By default she assumed this client had “they/them” pronouns and felt ashamed for slipping and saying “she” when the entire discussion was an innocuous “where do I know this person from.”

No one corrected her. No one was sympathetic when she said she wasn’t sure how to refer to the client with the client out of the building. They were all obviously afraid to speak up or make their coworker feel at ease in the moment. It told me where we are as a society. This is Georgia, not California!

This DEI madness is messing with people’s minds, makes them question themselves and self censor which is the end goal for control and profit. Fear, uncertainty and doubt. Nothing that targets and disrespects individuals for the color of their skin, like in this Canadian incident, is really about diversity, equity or inclusion. It’s about domination, power and money.

There was a lot more going on in this ex-principal’s headbone, like you mentioned. Other than standing up to those racist thugs preaching the DIE nonsense he had bigger issues.

I don’t think, after reading about this guy, he was a good teacher/administrator. I would like more information but the way the sympathetic part of the article portrays him, I just wonder what his viewpoints were concerning the LBQT or whatever they’re called today, were?

I’m from the classic liberal mindset, I personally don’t care what people do behind their closed doors, but once you bring your “you” out into the public, that’s a no-no. Especially the ones that are called teachers/administrators in my state that pushed the legislature to enact a law shielding themselves from being held accountable for encouraging and kidnapping minor children who want to be sexually mutilated for life under the guise of gender affirming care.

Look at the list of survivors, his contractual re-employment and as you clearly pointed out, “Why? For the love of God, Why?” I think it’s because there was a lack of the love of God throughout his entire adult life, clearly at the end.