Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27

Getting rid of the electoral college would mean election campaigns would be held only in New York, and California.

I could almost see that as a benefit, since ALL of the electoral college votes go to the winner in those 2 states, even if 49% of the vote are against.

The problem is that those states have so any electoral college electors. The GOP starts with over a hundred vote disadvantage.

I’d rather see a state be split up or change to one electoral vote PER DISTRICT (get rid of winner-take-all)


5 posted on 07/12/2023 9:08:42 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. K

No...it would be New York,Kalifornia,Texas,Florida and Illinois.


8 posted on 07/12/2023 9:32:32 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Two Words: BANANA REPUBLIC!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. K

It would also mean those are the only two states they need to utilize the cheat machine.


22 posted on 07/12/2023 1:44:13 PM PDT by CommieCutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. K

I think if you break up the electoral distribution by popular distribution, that makes the whole thing moot and you’re back to popular vote only.


34 posted on 07/12/2023 8:12:18 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson