Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/03/2023 11:45:28 AM PDT by proust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: proust

Bejeweled Dowagers beware! Time to downsize your lifestyle or maybe even find employment!


2 posted on 07/03/2023 11:49:13 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

> permanent alimony

What a nightmare. Sounds like it was an incentive to divorce. Anything to break up families.


3 posted on 07/03/2023 11:53:32 AM PDT by ArcadeQuarters (You can't remove RINOs by voting for them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

It sounds like there are some complicated issues, depending on age and health and finances of the person paying the alimony.

Is an ex-wife entitled to lifetime alimony and not ever told she should get a job? I don’t have the answer but just pointing out, this is a complication.

It does seem extreme, that the ex-husband has to work past retirement age, just to pay alimony to a similar aged ex-wife. What about social security, for example? She would be getting social security at that age.


4 posted on 07/03/2023 11:54:59 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

There goes the women voters. /s


5 posted on 07/03/2023 11:55:00 AM PDT by showme_the_Glory (No more rhyming, and I mean it.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

How about ending child support for kids that DNA proves aren’t yours?


6 posted on 07/03/2023 11:57:18 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust
The "right to retire" sums it up, nicely.

I do see some legitimate opposition, but on balance the bill seems more fair than permanent alimony.

7 posted on 07/03/2023 11:59:36 AM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never, never, never...in nothing, great or small...Winston ChurchIill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

Marriage is grand.

Divorce is a hundred grand.........................


8 posted on 07/03/2023 12:02:21 PM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

Permanent alimony is insane, as is alimony over 10 years IMO. Especially when coupled with assets split 50/50. One, or the other perhaps, but not both.


11 posted on 07/03/2023 12:08:11 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

I think it should depend on who broke the marriage contract.


14 posted on 07/03/2023 12:10:04 PM PDT by bankwalker (Repeal the 19th ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

Eventually you have to pull that big old fat tick full of blood off and flush it down the toilet


16 posted on 07/03/2023 12:12:36 PM PDT by NWFree (Sigma male 🤪)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

Is that something the government should get involved in? It would be more helpful if he ended no fault dovorce.


17 posted on 07/03/2023 12:17:05 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

I seems fair to shut down the alimony if the spouse getting a check remarries-either by license or common law/declaration to someone else-or like child support-stop it when the kids reach the age of 18, unless they are in college-otherwise if is just an ongoing rip-off of an ex-spouse...


19 posted on 07/03/2023 12:19:29 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

Alimony show be for no more than 18 months unless they were unfaithful, then make it no more than 5 years,

It 2023 ladies, GET A JOB.


20 posted on 07/03/2023 12:21:03 PM PDT by packrat35 (Pureblood! No clot shot for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

Excellent! This limits alimony in common sense ways. No longer can someone get alimony forever and for any reason. Of course, this passed once it was found many women were the bread winners.


22 posted on 07/03/2023 12:24:01 PM PDT by CodeToad (No Arm up! They have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

Had she never been married..and had a kid(s) ..i guess she would have gone on welfare for the rest of her life?


26 posted on 07/03/2023 12:36:13 PM PDT by Leep (What skill or service did the biden family have that netted them tens of millions of dollars?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

A fresh new crop of Entitled-Karen-Freakouts coming up on YouTube.

Shortages of box wine and cat collars too.


27 posted on 07/03/2023 12:42:54 PM PDT by Justa (If where you came from is so great then why aren't Floridians moving there?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

I really think this should be left up to the judge.

One extreme a woman marries at 18 like I did, avoids college and career building to focus on husband’s education, home keeping and career, and gets dumped or cheated on or serious abused at 45 you know what, lifetime alimony.

Other extreme a well educated career gal marries at 30 loses no income gets bored at 35 and leaves the man - no alimony.

It is not just to take a woman’s prime educational, childbearing, and career building years and then dump her. She should get life time alimony of a reasonable amount if she was gutted. There is no emotional, career, or financial rebuild at the point to be made.


28 posted on 07/03/2023 12:45:08 PM PDT by Persevero (You cannot comply your way out of tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

Reagan approved of no-fault divorce in California and it spread across the nation.

It was another dagger in the family unit.


33 posted on 07/03/2023 1:07:30 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi (This is the end of the Republic....because we could not keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust
"First Wives Advocacy Group,"

Oh, my. Don't forget guys - it's PERMANENT.

40 posted on 07/03/2023 1:25:35 PM PDT by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proust

Let them go back to work!


41 posted on 07/03/2023 1:26:49 PM PDT by Reno89519 (DeSantis 2024. Successful Governor, Honorable Veteran, Respectful, Respected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson