Giving up your child to a gay couple is wrong to begin with. The rest is moot.
Why should we care what two men do in their bedroom?
(that is so ‘yesterday’, now)
Homosexual men concluding a business deal with a birthing mom to satisfy their egos and create a perverted facade of normalcy as justification for their short-term homosexual relationship?
yeah. Its par for the course.
Compulsory abortions, and compulsory euthanasia, are coming. And they will quickly become weaponized politically, as surely as the turning of the earth.
I have a slightly off topic question: Why would a husband consent or tolerate his wife acting as surrogate mother when they already have four children of their own?
Do most surrogates earn a high amount of money?
It must be highly rewarding in some manner to justify putting her body and mind through the entire experience.
a real father would give his life to save his son or daughter...
two fake men showing their true “worth”
Where would all the “my body, my choice” types chime in here?
The woman is a married mother of four who had already volunteered to be a surrogate mother once before and had a good experience, so she decided to try and help again.
I have to wonder if her breast cancer is hereditary, coincidence or induced by several rounds of hormones inevitably used during this and her previous surrogacy?
I suspect the mother could have gone to another state that would consider such a contract null and void. I agree, however, that the surrogacy arrangement was immoral on its face.
The actual mother, sorry, gestational carrier, has zero rights as the true birth mother. Nice Californica. I wonder if the “my body, my choice” fanatics will be up in arms when the state orders an abortion. This is going to sideways for the left real quick, but then again, no one will report it.
Surrogate “motherhood” is an abomination. This should not exist in a civilized country.
“These ‘parents’ are freaking despicable”
Case closed
Never do anything for worthless Homos, particularly in a worthless GloboHomoNazi state like Calipornia.
Hopefully, the baby will survive with no ill effects, and the mother will fully recover.
Under the 13th Amendment, isn’t ownership of humans as property by the gay couple illegal?
…”It’s not nice to fool with Mother Nature”…
Oh, that's right, reality says, real men, cannot have babies.
THEY (both) would not have their DNA out there. A gay couple cannot produce a child. There has to be some other party involved to provide either the sperm or the egg.
Perhaps the woman carrying the baby provided the egg, but maybe not. Nevertheless, who ever donated what to make that child possible, should also have a say in that child's life.
Sad to say, it's probably for the better that that poor baby didn't make it since it was being already treated by the alleged parents as a commodity with less value than an old shoe.
The child is in paradise and will never be sick or unhappy. The “gay couple” may not ever have that opportunity.
My mother had cancer in 1959 while she pregnant with me.