Posted on 06/30/2023 9:19:25 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
If LA County’s homeless population were its own city, it would be the 124th largest city in the entire state. Every year the city does a homeless count designed to help keep track of whether the problem is getting better or worse. This year, despite a flood of money directly at programs, the news was pretty bad.
Unsheltered homelessness — which refers to people living outdoors in vehicles, tents and makeshift shelters like propped-up tarps — is up 40% over the past five years, rising to 55,155 people countywide…
When including people in shelters in the tally, the count found that 75,518 people were unhoused in L.A. County, including 46,260 in the city of L.A.
That works out to a 9% jump in LA County and a 10% jump in the city itself compared to last year. That’s bad but it’s not for lack of trying. The NY Times calls LA the “test case” for addressing homelessness.
Los Angeles is hardly the only American city to struggle with homelessness, but its homeless population is disproportionately large, and about 30 percent of the nation’s homeless population lives in California. As a result, Los Angeles is a kind of large-scale test case for which solutions work and which don’t…
Mayor Karen Bass, a longtime community organizer and former member of Congress, was elected last year on promises to make a dent in a colossal problem quickly. She vowed to move thousands of people living in encampments humanely, by spending more time on outreach before cleanups. She has said that the only way to achieve that goal is to improve communication among nonprofit groups and government agencies.
In fact, Mayor Bass declared a state of emergency on homelessness on her first day in office.
Bass has promised to bring 17,000 people inside in her first year in office. There are more than 41,000 people who are homeless living in the city of Los Angeles, according to the most recent count. The count found roughly 69,000 people experiencing homelessness across L.A. County.
To be fair here, the actual count on which the new figures are based happened in January. Bass had only been in office about six weeks at that point. Still, the fact that the trend hasn’t changed despite all of the money and time poured into it has some local officials pretty upset.
Councilmember Traci Park, who represents part of the Westside, said the city has been relying on “bad policy,” devoting too few resources to the issues of substance abuse and mental health.
“It is clear to me what we have done so far has not worked,” she said. “Despite throwing billions of dollars at this problem over the last number of years, we have failed to address the growth of encampments on the streets.”
The results of the homelessness count, called “devastating” by one council member, have also become routine at this point. The city has logged an increase in seven of the last eight annual counts, even as its yearly budget for addressing the issue has exceeded $1 billion…
In the months since the count was conducted, Bass has secured the approval of a record $1.3 billion in spending on homelessness, as part of a city budget that goes into effect Saturday. Of that total, at least $250 million will be devoted to Inside Safe.
It’s pretty hard to argue that LA hasn’t focused on the problem enough or devoted enough money to dealing with it. And yet the numbers get worse every year. The general line of argument from activists is that this is all the result of a lack of affordable housing. There may be some truth to that. California has become a place where any and every project can be blocked by local officials or random individuals using environmental regulations. It’s part of the reason the high-speed rail effort has been such a disaster.
But I think the activists have also been downplaying the degree to which the chronic homeless, i.e. the people who are on the street year after year, are dealing with drug abuse and mental problems. Back in 2019 the LA Times did its own estimate of the number of homeless people suffering from these problems and it was dramatically different from the numbers shown to local officials.
The Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, which conducts the annual count, narrowly interpreted the data to produce much lower numbers. In its presentation of the results to elected officials earlier this year, the agency said only 29% of the homeless population had either a mental illness or substance abuse disorder and, therefore, 71% “did not have a serious mental illness and/or report substance use disorder.”
The Times, however, found that about 67% had either a mental illness or a substance abuse disorder. Individually, substance abuse affects 46% of those living on the streets — more than three times the rate previously reported — and mental illness, including post-traumatic stress disorder, affects 51% of those living on the streets, according to the analysis…
The findings lend statistical support to the public’s frequent association of mental illness, physical disabilities and substance abuse with homelessness.
Obviously a difference like that is going to impact how you deal with the problem. If two-thirds have problems that go beyond affordable housing, maybe we should focus more on helping people deal with those problems.
What is encouraged...increases! Quelle Surprise!
Gruesome Newsome needs to get on the ball. The Demented One is expanding the homeless population with illegal aliens.
People are moving to take advantage. Wish they would ship all in Reno to there.
That’s like “pigeon population up despite flood of money spent on bird seed”.
Stop watering the weeds!
You’ll only get a blooming mess.
Does anyone think the money for “homeless programs” is for those that are homeless and to solve that problem? Of course it isn’t. Those programs are to get funding into the coffers so that elected officials, their relatives, and other properly “connected” people can obtain government funded money deposited into their accounts each month.
Doing away with those programs would cause great financial harm for those that live on the “Hill” and dependent on that money to fund their lifestyles.
Perhaps they meant...
Homelessness up 10% in LA *because of* a flood of money for programs
Keep giving people everything they need to be comfortable being homeless, and this is what you will get.
MORE *homelessness*.
You mean if you pay for something you get more of it?
As St. Ronnie said, government doesn’t solve problems, it subsidizes them.
The poli’s want homelessness to keep existing. It makes voters want someone to “fix” the problem. The poli’s represent that they will....get bonds voted on, and use the money to enrich their housing developer friends and the governmental social service sectors. Those people in return give the poli’s perks($). Meanwhile the poli’s never enforce drug laws, public health laws, or try and solve the problems. It’s a racket. Solve the drug and mental health problems.
L.A. the “Field of Dreams” of cities. Throw away more tax payer money and they will come.
if you subsidize a behavior you get more of it.
Homelessness up 10% in LA due to a flood of money for programs
If the government wants to end homelessness, they should just tax it not subsidize it. Fools. /s
Cities like San Francisco should turn their empty office buildings in to free public housing. Indigents live for free and have all the food and drugs they need. Oh, sorry. Can’t cross the interstate. Must stay in the city.
Idiocracy and Escape from New York were prophecies.
Offer “programs” and “assistance” to bums and you get more bum, what is surprising about that? Years ago I had two squirrels living in my backyard tree. I started putting out a handful of peanuts for them every day. Before long I had 20 squirrels in my yard. There was a lesson worth learning in that.
Does anyone actually believe the money or ‘assistance’/benefits actually reach the people in need. Seriously???
“Homelessness up 10% in LA despite a flood of money for programs”
...and “Crime declines DESPITE more people in jail.” Leftist reporters have actually said that, and were serious.
First, discard the euphemism "homeless." These are hard core addicts and dedicated alcoholics. There's a fringe comprised of wanted fugitives who are hiding from the law.
But they all love the lifestyle. Stupid liberals virtue signal by giving them money, blankets, food. And when an addict or alcoholic scores their drug of choice, they share. It's their socialization.
Only a moron thinks they can cure this epidemic. The only way to clean up LA is to build bigger prisons and start enforcing the law. Otherwise it's only going to get worse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.