The old hag should resign from the bench.
They shopped around until they found the right Christian then went to court ?
I was initially happy to hear the result, but if the wise Latina/ left wing stooge hack doesn’t like the result, perhaps I should reconsider
“The Wise Lesbo-Latinx” is raging!
Hard to believe she can’t see the distinction between immutable physical characteristics and personal decisions to define one’s life in terms of sexual perversions.
Tard didn’t belong on the court in the first place.
Who gives a rat’s turd?
It isn’t a protected class, it is a protected choice.
Scathe all you want baby it will do no good.
However, before the end of summer these race baiting, poverty pimping, queer loving cretins will have their followers whipped into a frenzy and rioting.
Scathing! The wise latina has spoken!
She likes to read her dissents from the bench. She’s done this before.
I wonder why. Does she get more attention from the talking heads on MSNBC when she “dramatically” espouses the liberal view which just got outvoted????
They are NOT a protected class, by law.
Though the left would LIKE them to be under the BS STORY about GENDER protections.
The court essentially ruled that “gender” protections applies to the male and female genders...and there are no others.
Homos/trans are NOT a protected class.
Major ruling.
Is she a dyke?
I hope she will get over it.
Lib tribe heap big mad!
I’m loving it!™️
This ugly racist hispanic should just call in her vote. Why even hear the case. She’s already decided before it’s even heard. I do not know of a single time she has ever voted with the conservative side. It’s comical to think anything but her own agenda drives her decisions Certainly not the constitutioin. She’s so ugly because of what’s inside her even more than what’s outside and that’s saying a lot.
Sonia has no concept of what liberty really is.
The other part of this argument is the “refuse to serve” part. These cases are not about someone who took items off a shelf, went to the checkout line and the business owner refused to take their cash for goods available to anyone. Insted this was an attempt to force someone to create something - an act of speech - to express something they found abhorrent.
Religious people, NOT A PROTECTED CLASS, despite the FIRST amendment.
But LGBT, PROTECTED CLASS.
“right to refuse to serve members of a protected class”
Twisted reality. First, nobody should be a ‘protected class’ everyone should be equal. Second, the person that refused did so on religious grounds. This was outlined and protected by the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and without it, there would have been no United States.
Business make money by commerce, and excluding people and groups from that commerce is generally bad business. These cases are what I call ‘gotcha’ things. Who wants a someone who has a religious objection to do your graphic design for a wedding, when you could go down the street and find someone who has ZERO religious objection. This was an assault on a persons beliefs and business, and it’s disgusting. Just because some people believe that they are a ‘protected’ class doesn’t mean they have the right to assault the religious beliefs and business of someone else. This isn’t life and death stuff, it isn’t even an inconvenience for them to pick another business, they were just doing it as an “I gotcha”.
Colorado needs to rethink laws that allow people to harass people of faith using a law that was intended to prevent harassment.