George, though a horrible human being, is a brilliant financier. He built a $25 billion fortune from nothing. His son Alex sounds like a no talent party animal/ideologue. I’d bet on it being a certainty that he will squander whatever inheritance is left to him rather than building it up like George did. So while Alex will do damage in the short term with that money, at least it will dissipate the Soros fortune.
I read somewhere his son bragged he is 16x (or some such 💩 number) more radical left than his father.
Number 1, that is impossible…..
He's a convicted inside-trader in France.
He stole the pension funds of over a dozen nations.
He's more of a brilliant thief than a brilliant financier.
The issue is where the two intersect. As a product of Nazi Germany, George leveraged his horrible tendencies in ways that no other financiers do. He has actively financed the worst people you can find purposefully for destabilization. Then when destabilization occurs, short the currency. Profit off of full-scale collapse and death. George has no problem at all with destroying.
I do not know of anybody else who has used a network of non-profit entities to this end as George has done. Not one. Normally non-profits get used in a one-to-one scenario: an entity for racial justice seeks racial justice. That's just not how George sees it. George sees all non-profits as a collection of disparate and seemingly non-related non-profits for a different, larger purpose.
The environmental non-profit, the racial equity non-profit, the gun regulations non-profit, the youth educational non-profit, the elderly with disabilities non-profit are in fact all related - they are all cogs in a machine for the much larger purpose of tearing down the society as a whole. He doesn't actually care about environmental whatever. He cares about it can affect disruption. He doesn't care about youth education, he cares about how it can affect disruption. You can make a list of 30, it's always the same. George only cares in the end about how it can affect disruption, not actually about the thing itself that the non-profit purports to stand for.(the environment, for example.)
His son being born into lavish opulence and living his entire life that way (can, at worst) only be a big time financier for Greenpeace or hometown mayors against guns or pick your least favorite politician. He won't be a destabilizer. He won't be a destroyer. He lacks the historical culture, something which is extremely difficult to outright teach - especially a millennial party boy. His youth was (thankfully) formed in part by CNN and Nintendo and life in New York state, not Nazi Germany. As a dad no matter how hard you stress it you just can't replace it.
The point is, George stands in a class all of his own as not just a political bundler. It's almost a mistake to call George a financier. His son on the other hand, being addicted to the opulence, will be just another political power broker like a Tom Steyer or Bloomberg who wants that opulence to remain for himself. As extremely annoying as that is, it lacks the intersection of horrible human being, and doesn't result in destabilization. Soros Jr. will be nothing but a financier.