Posted on 06/29/2023 12:27:58 PM PDT by RandFan
Scientists have found shocking evidence that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine batches used in the European Union may have actually contained a sizable portion of placebos. The German regulator was aware of this and did not subject the batches to quality-control testing.
The researchers, Drs. Gerald Dyker, Professor of Organic Chemistry at the Ruhr University Bochum, and Jörg Matysik, Professor of Analytical Chemistry at the University of Leipzig, are two of five German-speaking researchers who have been openly raising concerns about the efficacy and security of the BioNTech vaccine (as it is known in Germany) for the past 18 months.
They recently discussed batch variability on the online show hosted by German journalist Milena Preradovic. Their reference point was a recent Danish study that revealed a wide range of adverse reactions linked to various batches of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, or BNT162b2 as it is known scientifically.
(Excerpt) Read more at theleadingreport.com ...
The fact checkers say that you are completely wrong, It was actually 6-7 lies ago.
Pharmaceutical companies were using the distribution of their shots as clinical
trials. Anybody who didn’t know that is dumber than a bunch of rocks.
Are they now saying this so they can claim that ‘rona infection and fatality rates are higher in the placebo group?
As if we can believe their reports that this city over here got the actual vaxseem and this city got the placebo.
Or do they want to claim that all these died suddenly’s and turbo cancers must be due to a complication of the ‘rona and not the vaxseem.
What exactly does the placebo consist or not consist of anyway? Is it pure saline or something else fairly harmless?
Or is it the liquid nanoparticle, itself a concern for adverse effects, but not the spike protein?
It wouldn’t surprise me to learn that there was something like a dozen or so different formulations, including pure saline, of varying amounts of spike protein, liquid nanoparticle, and other stuff.
But how to know who got what if a certain percentage of every lot was placebo?
For surely, if whole lots were placebo and other lots were full on mRNA spike protein, then it will be all to easy to show that the latter caused serious adverse reactions.
So what was the motive behind this?
To refine their killing techniques and figure out how much they had to spend on their concoctions to achieve the desired culling effects so they can save money next time if it turns out a little dab in the jab will do a lot of people?
To ensure not too many people dropped dead so as to avoid suspicion?
To market an expensive blood test to help people determine what was in their jab?
To accept lawsuits and to go out of business only to be ready with a brand new pharma company that has the cures for all the people who didn’t get the placebos?
That’s all I got. What other nefarious things are afoot with this?
“It appears that the good was bad, the bad was very bad, and the very good was saline solution, to paraphrase the findings of the German scientists regarding the variability of the Pfizer-BioNTech batches.”
I’m not sure what this means. I eagerly await clarification.
It if means what I suspect it means, it means a lot of pharma execs and the government bureaucrats who trusted them should probably try to arrange to die in a car accident so their family can collect life insurance money because I don’t think life insurance pays if you hang yourself— or are hanged on a gallows.
But, wow, how lucky or unlucky would you be if you went all in and got every booster and updated season ‘rona vaxseem you could and all were placebos or all were full of the bad stuff.
I am looking out my window right now and I see a lot of rocks on the ground that are smiling and feeling all smug about how they aren’t as dumb as the humans who just walked by them.
Science. Trust. Follow?
Gee... I wonder if someone is going to apply for a refund?
Or will there be lawsuits launched by families of folks who thought they were ‘vaccinated’ but ended up dying of WuFlu anyway.... now they can claim that they paid for protection they thought had but never got?
They were selling water? Smells like fraud.
“may have actually contained a sizable portion of placebos”
Umm, duh???
It was a clinical trial, and all clinical trials include a control group that is given placebos without their knowledge. Why are they now pretending not to be aware of this?
“If they believed they were getting a shot that could cause that.”
If that is possible, then show us how many people given placebos, in the thousands of clinical trials that have already been performed, just dropped dead after being given a placebo.
Shouldn’t be hard to find that evidence if the phenomena you are asserting is actually a real thing and not a figment of your imagination.
“So we have an untold potential 80% of people walking around thinking they are protected who didn’t get jack.”
No, that’s not the way statistics works. If he had tested just one vial and found it to be saline, you would be saying “potential 100%”, but in reality you just selected far too small a sample size to make any accurate determination of the percentage.
“You just need them for controlled research studie.”
Don’t you remember the “emergency authorization” for the vaccines? What that meant was “emergency authorization to expand the clinical trial to the general population”. It was still a clinical trial, and that meant they were still giving out placebos.
Bingo. I am saddened, but not too surprised that it took 22 posts for someone to mention this salient fact.
No, they agreed to participate in a clinical trial and were informed that they might receive a placebo. That was on that little piece of paper they gave everyone before the shots recieved “full FDA approval”. You know, the one nobody read.
How many people participate in clinical trials when they believe the shot will probably kill them?
Do they screen for suicidal participants?
The ones who got the placebos are the lucky ones...
“nocebo” means something stronger: “I shall harm.” The word “noxious” comes from the root of the word.
>>> No, that’s not the way statistics works. If he had tested just one vial and found it to be saline, you would be saying “potential 100%
I understand your point, but I wasn’t really offering that example of statistical proof. I mean that’s why i said potential... assuming 4 out of 5 is consistent, that’s 80%.
If you really want to get into serious statistics, I would argue there is zero evidence that the 1 out of 5 vials even worked... therefore we are back to 100%.
There... now you can shred more statistics.
Wow. Even worse than Deepak let on.
An earlier wrong turn for him was publicly stating the country should demand Trump have a mental test because he was crazy and unfit to lead. Shameful.
Soon the powers that be will declare that nobody got anything in the way of Covid shots but saline, so that it is impossible that anybody was harmed by any of the so-called “Covid vaccines.” This declaration would be no more outrageous than any of the other ever changing declarations to date.
Emily Litella would be invoked to share the news:
https://patch.com/img/cdn/users/87212/2012/01/raw/a8108dbc528815fb83a9d7da31ec9bf9.jpg
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
