[Telepathic Intruder]

It’s not a slur, it just means normal. The way nature made you as opposed to unnatural and artificial.

[KC Burke]

But it is the language perversion — using it or accepting it, shoves the whole Trans Gender, Pronoun crap right into the discourse.

[AnotherUnixGeek]

It’s not a slur, it just means normal.

There's already a word for that, and you just used it - normal. People who invent terms like "cis" to imply that normality is on the same footing as various fetishes can go pound sand.

[AndyTheBear]

Terms can have the same denotive meaning but very different connotations. “Cis” in common usage conotes contempt.

[Skwor]

“To: artichokegrower

It’s not a slur, it just means normal. The way nature made you as opposed to unnatural and artificial.”

Wrong, if so then why not use the word “normal”

cis was created to avoid that very word and used to bring down a group of people and align us with an equal footing of those who are abnormal.

It (cis) removes the distinction, now why do you suppose such people want to remove the distinction between normal and abnormal? Classic “Owellion speak” to remove from the culture a concept, making a citizen unable to speak and debate the concept, therefore making abnormal no different than normal.

[Rurudyne]

The slur is to need any word but normal to describe normal.

Trans and their champions are crazy nitwits advancing an evil satanic ideology.

[epluribus_2]

“they exchanged the natural for the unnatural...”

“natural”, “nature” are all about biology and ultimately, the truth.

[Dr. Sivana]

It’s not a slur, it just means normal.

It is a slur because it presumes the notion that your sex is assigned. I was not assigned a sex, I have a sex.