A Modest Proposal 4.0 -- "NOT FOR THE FAINT OF HEART"

An excellent idea if and when that time arises. It's time the Republican Party and especially Speaker Kevin McCarthy get very aggressive to try and save the Republic and our Constitution from further and continuing usurpation of the highest political offices and a total Marxist takeover. This all should have been aggressively addressed back in 2007 and 2008 by the Republican Party. But instead they were in on the betrayal of the U.S. Constitution as to presidential eligibility. The idea posited by Joseph DeMaio in his article is an excellent way to allow the U.S. Supreme Court to take up several issues regarding various kinds of Citizenship in the USA.

Now all the readers here need to make a concerted effort to get this DeMaio article before McCarthy’s eyes ASAP so he can read it, think about it, discuss it, and plan for the day such events may happen. Also get it to other key leadership people in the House and to members of the conservative and freedom caucuses. No need to bother with the Senate leadership as I see this, other than FYI, as they would not have any say in it, as I understand the process. So as we say … spread the word.

Incidentally, I believe that Kamala Harris could be challenged also on her simple basic “Citizen” at birth claim (aka Citizen at/by Birth), in addition to the constitutional “natural born Citizen” at birth claim. I do not believe she is even a “Citizen” at birth. She may may now be a basic Citizen having gained U.S. Citizenship later by marriage or some other method later in life depending on when her father naturalized and if Kamala was still a minor child when he naturalized. But I believe she did not gain U.S. Citizenship at birth either under the correct original intent and purpose of the 14th Amendment or under the Wong Kim Ark (1898) SCOTUS decision.

Per the 14th Amendment original intent meaning, she was not born “subject to the [full political] jurisdiction” of the United States since her parents were foreign nationals who were merely sojourning here on student VISAs.

And per the Wong Kim Ark (1898) SCOTUS decision, neither parent was a permanent resident or legally politically domiciled in the USA. And the Wong Kim Ark (1898) decision only grants “Citizen at Birth” status to a person born in the USA to parents who are legally domiciled here, which in the case of WKA (1898) SCOTUS decision both parents were and in the case of Kamala Harris both parents were not.

Thus, if McCarthy (if he had the courage) brought such a challenge to Kamala Harris, a lot of erroneous progressive citizenship law interpretations could be looked at and straightened out by the U.S. Supreme Court, using original intent and purposes of the applicable citizenship terms, and prior SCOTUS decisions and precedence, if they would have the courage to do it.

“Bravo Zulu!” to Joe DeMaio for another excellent article and idea. I for one will start circulating it and others reading here should too.

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) Author: Natural Born Citizen book

Simple enough-
Go down the list of ALL contenders for POTUS-
Vivek? Florida Man?
Why dance around the question?

We know our PDJT The GOAT is Natural Born as that was even investigated by the Cretins of The Left.
Once they found out the Naturalization date of Momma Trump, they quickly abandoned it.

Should be a basic requirement to provide proof-

Should be a basic requirement to provide proof-

But, but, but where would obama be today if that happened???

This is delusional nonsense. The Supreme Court will never take up a case related to the eligibility of a VP show was elected almost three years ago.

Ther Supreme Court is not the ultimate arbiter in a case like this, anyway. The eligibility issue effectively disappeared when candidates appeared on 51 state/DC ballots.

This is delusional nonsense.

Only in the sense that it supposes we have any legal means to remove Democrats from office. We don't.

Clever legal arguments are completely irrelevant by now. What counts is who controls the police and military forces, and the various government bureaucracies. To a much lesser extent, that includes who controls the Supreme Court. Right now, that isn't us.

Biden will remain in office for as long as he lives. And afterwards, an obedient Democrat will be appointed to replace him. I do not believe that will be Harris, simply because she is too stupid and bad-tempered to follow orders from the people who own the Democrat party.

"Laws are for little people". (Blade Runner)

I love how everyone looks for a “gimmick” to take these people out. Ain’t never gunna happen. Ihere’s only one solution left and it has to do with boxes, but no one wants to go there.

It won’t fly. After the election twice of the kenyan Citizen of the British Empire Barak Hussein O’Bama and the declarations of Congress that O’bama and McCain wee by fiat NBCs, anyone in the world can be elected President of the United States maybe so long as the candidate is resident on American soil while running. The Courts won’t touch it and neither political party will protest it if the Candidate is a Democrat.

Yes, simple for the candidates to provide the information so the voters can decide what they believe the Constitution is really requiring as to eligibility. I wrote an article on the need for more transparency by candidates for Pres and VP and how it could be easily be required to provide more personal and family history citizenship ID information, i.e., were the parents non-citizen foreign nationals at the time of the candidates birth in the USA and thus passed their foreign citizenship to their child making them a dual Citizen at birth, etc., to the FEC, just like they now must provide detailed financial information to the FEC. Use the governments standard form SF-86 form not to get a security clearance but simply provide the detailed answers to the questions therein to the voting public via filling it out and filing it out and filing it with the FEC where it would be made publicly available. We need to learn more about candidates who evade answering questions as to whether they were born as a dual or triple citizen. The were you ever a dual citizen question is one of the questions in the SF-86 form. See my article for the details about that and other key foreign influence questions asked in the SF-86 form. Many in the military have filled out that form and sometimes more than once in their career. It is time for more transparency and answered questions, not less and evading them. Here is the link for that: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2023/05/07/transparency-requirements-for-candidates-for-president-and-vice-president-more-is-needed-in-our-modern-electoral-process-filing-the-oge-financial-disclosure-form-278e-is-mandatory-the-opm-na/