Since when has an indictment been based on flippant, sarcastic remarks? I always thought they were based on hard evidence.........
But then again, this indictment isn't really based on settled law is it?
Non-sequitur.
The point is, if you make flippant remarks regarding secure materials, you will get scrutiny. Whether you get fired, suspended, or indicted isn’t the point here.
I’m not talking about his indictment. Just his apparent remarks.