Hopefully, The Supremes smack this dipshit into place.
I know that very few read the article before they comment, but if you had, you would have read that she was one of four who were in the minority in the losing end of the case that decided 11-4 that a non-violent felon should not be prohibited from purchasing a firearm. Since this is potentially a very far reaching decision, overturning a portion of the 1968 GCA (which retroactively prohibited all felons from possessing a firearm0 then it will go to the SC.
Since this is the en banc decision, the next step is the SC. So will the state that is pursuing the case against the defendant appeal to the SC and take the chance that the SC will overturn this law?