To: AnthonySoprano
Why bother? The Senate wouldn’t convict.
27 posted on
06/10/2023 11:24:04 AM PDT by
CarmichaelPatriot
(Recovering Kalifornian... Loving Alabama!)
To: CarmichaelPatriot
Exactly...It’s a total waste of time.
To: CarmichaelPatriot
Why bother? The Senate wouldn’t convict. Also, which Democrat presidential candidate would we rather run against?
63 posted on
06/10/2023 1:35:32 PM PDT by
TChad
(Progressives are in favor of removing healthy sex organs from children. Conservatives oppose this.)
To: CarmichaelPatriot
“Why bother? The Senate wouldn’t convict.”
Why did Pelosi bother? Twice?
67 posted on
06/10/2023 2:29:28 PM PDT by
map
To: CarmichaelPatriot
The Senate wouldn’t convict. The Senate would be on the record nullifying the Bribery clause of the Constitution.
-PJ
80 posted on
06/10/2023 3:41:16 PM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
To: CarmichaelPatriot
If impeachment works in the House he’s been impeached.
That’s the point.
89 posted on
06/10/2023 5:48:15 PM PDT by
Syncro
(God is Good--Facts is Facts)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson