Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The judge assigned to oversee Trump's criminal case was appointed by Trump himself
NPR ^ | NPR Washington desk

Posted on 06/09/2023 12:09:33 PM PDT by CaptainK

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has been assigned, at least for now, to oversee the case stemming from Donald Trump's indictment, a source confirmed to NPR on Friday.

Trump appointed Cannon to the bench in 2020, and she is the same judge who ruled in favor of Trump's request to appoint a special master to review documents seized by the FBI from Mar-a-Lago last summer, a move that temporarily stopped federal prosecutors from continuing their investigation into the documents.

(Excerpt) Read more at npr.org ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aileencannon; maralago; trump; trumpindictment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 06/09/2023 12:09:33 PM PDT by CaptainK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

“at least for now”

Hint Hint!


2 posted on 06/09/2023 12:10:50 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

About time we got one of OUR judges.


3 posted on 06/09/2023 12:10:58 PM PDT by Fido969 (45 is Superman! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK
The judge assigned to oversee Trump's criminal case was appointed by Trump himself

Well -- yeah.

Isn't this something that is likely to happen when you indict a former President?

4 posted on 06/09/2023 12:11:05 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I've just pissed in my pants and nobody can do anything about it." -- Major Fambrough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

And?

What say you, Captn K, who’s posting an NPR article?


5 posted on 06/09/2023 12:11:07 PM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a conspiracy theory in ‘20 is now fact. Land of the sheep, home of the knaves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

Good.

Hopefully she causes problems for these corrupt assholes.


6 posted on 06/09/2023 12:12:01 PM PDT by unclebankster ( Globalism is the last refuge of a scoundrel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

Didn’t they try to sanction her or something the last time she was involved in the Mar-a-Lago document case? I think she was a mediator but was taken off the case in favor of a biased judge.


7 posted on 06/09/2023 12:14:29 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man (The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical objects )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

Since many of those judicial appointments were made through uni-party recommendations, I wouldn’t put too much faith in the judge’s impartiality.


8 posted on 06/09/2023 12:14:50 PM PDT by GMMC0987
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

She’s Trump’s ace in the hole. Has consistently ruled in his favor in the past. She was the one who appointed the special master. Although all the other courts overrode her so it might not amount to much.


9 posted on 06/09/2023 12:15:11 PM PDT by GulliverSwift
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK; Sidebar Moderator

NPR?


10 posted on 06/09/2023 12:15:11 PM PDT by StAnDeliver (Tanned, rested, and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

It’s a matter of fact article with an important fact about the appointment of Trump’s trial judge.

It’s not an editorial. Jeez.


11 posted on 06/09/2023 12:15:28 PM PDT by CaptainK ("If life's really hard, at least its short")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

See post 11.


12 posted on 06/09/2023 12:16:18 PM PDT by CaptainK ("If life's really hard, at least its short")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GMMC0987

Dems don’t want Trump convicted. They would have never brought this case in Miami if they wanted a slam dunk conviction.


13 posted on 06/09/2023 12:17:33 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

What’s also troubling is that DJT also appointed Chris Wray as FBI director.


14 posted on 06/09/2023 12:17:48 PM PDT by Rappini (Hope means coming in second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

That this judge was appointed by Trump is, on it’s own, no great cause for rejoicing. So many of Trumps’ appointments have turned out to be RINOs or Timid Sheep waiting to be told what direction to take.

Kavanaugh and Barrett come to mind.
Judge Barrett certainly fooled me. Kavanaugh, I wasn’t too surprised about. He became the unlikely center of a partisan electoral storm just for that moment of his confirmation.


15 posted on 06/09/2023 12:19:10 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

.


16 posted on 06/09/2023 12:22:51 PM PDT by sauropod (“If they don’t believe our lies, well, that’s just conspiracy theorist stuff, there.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift

“Although all the other courts overrode her so it might not amount to much.”


The SC Justice that oversees THIS court is C. Thomas.

Makes me feel pretty well.


17 posted on 06/09/2023 12:28:42 PM PDT by BBB333 (The Power Of Trump Compels You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift

She did not rule in his favor. She ruled in the laws favor.


18 posted on 06/09/2023 12:32:33 PM PDT by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fido969; All

No, unless its dyed in the wool MAGA hat wearer he’s not “one of ours”.


19 posted on 06/09/2023 12:39:30 PM PDT by wiseprince (Me,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

Barrett loved praise to much. She’ll probably be a lefty by the end


20 posted on 06/09/2023 12:42:20 PM PDT by wiseprince (Me,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson