I salute him for going about things the right way. If the Gun Grabbers want to curtail or abolish gun rights, they need to persuade a supermajority of their fellow citizens to support it, get a 2/3rds super majority in each house of Congress and then get 3/4s of the states to ratify it. That is the constitutionally correct and proper way to do things.
Now that being said, I will oppose this and any other infringement on our natural right and constitutional right to keep and bear arms with every fiber of my being.
Newsom proposes constitutional amendment to restrict gun rights.
He needs to look at his crooked DA and court system and the lack of police officers first problem solved.
He’s just another stooge in office.
Camera hound.
FUGN, oh and don’t forget to ESAD.
We need a constitutional right to restrict hair gel use for men.
It’s a campaign move, that’s all it is.
The 2nd Amendment prohibits this.
The right ton keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
His proposal will infringe on a person’s 2nd amendment rights.
C’mon,Governor Hair Gel....don’t be a coward. Don’t go half way! Go for complete repeal. It’ll be easy...at least 45 states will ratify it!
He’s trying to get his camel nose under the tent.
He will be the Democrat choice in 2028, if not 2024.
I hope he is NEVER “elected” POTUS, but fear he will be with the Democrat vote fraud machine firmly in place.
Propose all he wants. There’s no way 2/3 of Congress and 3/4 of states will ratify it.
Good luck Gavin in getting that Article V process going. You’re a lunatic an most of the country knows it. Titling at windmills he is.
So, should I go ahead and reserve a front-row seat in the courts for this? I would assume the ink won’t be dry before the challenge is filed.
I would rather have:
A Balanced Budget Amendment with Term Limits.
I hope everyone realizes that this man wants to be president. If you think biden is bad for the country, just wait!
This is why the left is using law enforcement as its private mafia to harass and stop Donald J. Trump.
I’m pretty sure you cannot amend the first ten (10) amendments-the Bill of Rights. You’ll need a Constitutional Convention for that.
The 2nd Amendment does not “establishes a right to bear firearms for personal self-defense” - it does no such thing. It states that “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
The term “well regulated” in the time in which it was written meant well-trained, skilled, firearms and other in well maintained ready to use condition. It did not and never has meant “reglated” as in some regulation local or otherwise.
Since all of the People- as then defined as able bodied males (and females) were to consist of the “Militia” of each of the United... States— then all of the People should not have their keeping and bearing (in public or otherwise) of Arms infringed by the “government” so described in Constitution, Amended in the 2nd of the first Amendments to the Constitution known as the Bill of Rights. These Bills of Rights were limitations on the government- not on the People. What the government cannot do- ever.
Fox News is full of crap, and the description of the 2nd Amendment to be Amended by the 28th is ridiculous, and no way Constitutional.
Newsom, the next presidential candidate from the ass party.
Mark my words.
5.56mm
Good luck with that.
nope!!
The American people DO NOT want any more laws!
The American people DO WANT lawbreakers arrested, tried, convicted and sent to prison!