Posted on 06/03/2023 7:08:17 PM PDT by lightman
Get exposed, don't get jabbed.
Now, many have lost the ability to fight of coronaviruses after taking the Jim Jone Jab.
Just ask the Amish...
Ja!
Get exposed, don't get jabbed.
Correct. All we had to do was to protect our elderly so they don't get infected all at once. That's what we saw in Lombardy, Italy and New York City at the beginning. All the people who were dying were elderly. But if you're young, proceed as normal.
BINGO.
Keep Grandma safe.
Don’t kill the economy out of fear of killing Grandma.
The epidemic of fear is ALWAYS more destructive than the epidemic of disease.
From the article:
Approximately 26 percent of people had antibodies from only vaccination, 22.6 percent had antibodies from only infection, and 47.7 percent had antibodies from both, researchers found.
Questions: What portion of the cohort had been vaccinated? How many times? How many vaccinated people also have had positive Covid tests? Is this paragraph saying that 22.6% had antibodies through natural immunity only? How do they account for people with antibodies who had Covid but never knew it because they were asymptomatic?
Infection-induced immunity was more common among the unvaccinated in the cohort.
This is a cliff-hanger. HOW MUCH MORE common was immunity due to infection alone? And again, do they account for asymptomatic cases where there is immunity?
Natural immunity known , at least, since the Athenian Plague in 430 BC. ~Thucydides
I had the Wu Hu Flu in the spring of 2020 No jabs
My antibodies were tested in
Sept 2021... great antibodies
Sept 2022 ...great antibodies
Sept 2023 ...???????????
I am elderly and after about 1 month of seclusion I said “ To hell with this,I’m going out. “……….and here I am.
……
Yeah, that’s because nearly everyone has had a cold and/or the flu before.
Yup.
“COVID zero” (and its American permutation) was Sisyphian attempt to eliminate the common cold.
6 in my immediate family and only one of us (my youngest boy) ever got it, and what he had was so mild as to be laughable.
How would anyone know if or not they’d been exposed?
Wait, what? I thought vaccines stop you from getting the infection? You mean this one didn't work that way? That sure isn't the way I understood the selling points.
“Some 96.4 percent of people . . . had evidence of antibodies against COVID-19.
“Approximately 26 percent of people had antibodies from only vaccination, 22.6 percent had antibodies from only infection, and 47.7 percent had antibodies from both, researchers found.
“Infection-induced immunity was more common among the unvaccinated in the cohort.”
OK, maybe I am math impaired, but that last line doesn’t make sense. If I am doing the math right, 73.7 percent of the sample had antibodies and were vaccinated. And about half of the sample had both the vaccine and an infection. Seems to me then that about 2/3rds of the folks that were vaccinated also got the infection.
Or are they being tricky and are really saying that 100% of the people that had infection-induced immunity only were not vaccinated? Uh, of course.
How would anyone know if or not they’d been exposed?
At the 96.4 positivity rate....YOU can pretty much bet on having been exposed :-)
Look how many other coronaviruses (flus/colds) you’ve been exposed to, in your lifetime.
We told folks this, from day one...yet, the $hills had to push fear and $hots....for something that REAL scientists/docs knew would provide herd immunity, MUCH SOONER, had it been left alone (no jabs).
Thank you, FRAUDci, CDC, hospitals, Froctors and $hot $hills.
Exactly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.