[Rocco DiPippo]

I'm a very experienced builder and have been CM and PM on buildings of this size in combat zones, and for years. From my experiences dealing with buildings that got slammed by rockets and bombs, the interior damage (where it can be clearly seen) looks like rocket/artillery damage. The outside, namely the condition of the cement/plaster facade away from the blast area, nope.

It looks like the building's exterior, aesthetic condition was poor before the strike. What is needed to tell whether or not this is or isn't another "Ghost Of Kiev" "Youcrayne's winning in Bakhmut" "Ruzzziiiaans eat babies" fantasy tale is a recent photo of the building, showing it as a very recently operational hospital, before the damage happened to it.

For now, I'll conclude from the pic that this is a derelict or empty building that got hit by a rocket or bomb through the roof.

[MeganC]

Just because it is a derelict building doesn’t mean it wasn’t being used for an hospital. Dnipro is a war zone and in a war zone you use what you have.

Also, the images of a clinical hospital in Dnipro correspond with the design of the ruined building we see in the news. The “clinical hospital” description also explains the variations in the media calling it either a clinic or an hospital.

As an experienced builder I am sure you will see the similarities.

http://wikimapia.org/26703816/City-Clinical-Hospital-No-8