Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-Manhattan district attorney refuses to answer questions about Trump indictment before Jordan committee
Washington Examiner ^ | May 12, 2023 | Jerry Dunleavy

Posted on 05/12/2023 9:37:15 PM PDT by Coronal

A former Manhattan district attorney’s office prosecutor refused to answer questions about Alvin Bragg’s 34-count felony indictment of former President Donald Trump after he was subpoenaed to appear by House Republicans.

Mark Pomerantz, who resigned from the prosecutor’s office in February 2022 after District Attorney Bragg’s predecessor, Cyrus Vance, didn’t pursue the charges that were then finally filed earlier this year by Bragg, declined to answer any questions about the Trump investigation on Friday.

“I am here because I respect the rule of law," Pomerantz said behind closed doors in front of the GOP-led House Judiciary Committee. “What I do not respect is the committee’s use of subpoena power to compel me to participate in an act of political theater.”

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, had asked for Pomerantz’s voluntary cooperation in late March, but Pomerantz declined to do so at the direction of Bragg.

Jordan followed up with a subpoena in early April, calling on Pomerantz to appear for a deposition, noting that Pomerantz “led the investigation” into Trump’s finances “before resigning in protest” after Bragg’s “initial reluctance to move forward with charges” against the former president.

"Pomerantz’s public statements about the investigation strongly suggest that Bragg’s prosecution of President Trump is politically motivated,” Jordan contended last month, in part a reference to Pomerantz’s book, "People vs. Donald Trump".

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 05/12/2023 9:37:15 PM PDT by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coronal

.
This wasn’t a Criminal trial or anything, they just wanted to ask him some questions - but he repeatedly, over and over, claimed the Fifth.

The people questioning him can’t charge anyone, and all the referrals from Republicans have been ignored. Seems odd.

Must be something big


2 posted on 05/12/2023 9:42:12 PM PDT by AnthonySoprano (Statute of Limitations is going to elapse on Hunter Biden )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

Hold him in contempt.
Is that too much to ask of McCarthy?


3 posted on 05/12/2023 9:47:09 PM PDT by tennmountainman ( Less Lindell CONS, More AZ Style Audits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Apparently he’s invoking the 5th on any questions relating to the investigation.


4 posted on 05/12/2023 9:50:29 PM PDT by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

Aren’t most Congressional Hearing “political theater”?

And yet everyone is expected to answer questions, whether they want to be in that production or not?


5 posted on 05/12/2023 10:15:20 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

This is something Pomeranz will not be able to Bragg about in the future. He will pay for his unethical behavior.


6 posted on 05/13/2023 12:46:30 AM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper (Figures )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

So how is contempt enforced by Congress?

Does the DOJ take over?

If so, there is no sanction.


7 posted on 05/13/2023 1:56:46 AM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota

Ask Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon.


8 posted on 05/13/2023 2:42:04 AM PDT by vivenne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

Jail him


9 posted on 05/13/2023 3:09:27 AM PDT by Chickensoup (Genocide is here. Leftist extremists are spearhheading the Genocide against conservatives. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

Citizens can use the 5th amendment but government employees can not.


10 posted on 05/13/2023 4:04:13 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again," )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Aren’t most Congressional Hearing “political theater”?

ANY visible machination of our government is "political theater"

11 posted on 05/13/2023 4:09:20 AM PDT by Roccus (Veritas, non verba magistri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

This wasn’t a Criminal trial or anything, they just wanted to ask him some questions - but he repeatedly, over and over, claimed the Fifth.
**********
You can only invoke the Fifth if it might incriminate you, so if this dude is indeed invoking the Fifth, he is implying that he might be guilty of a crime.

Are you certain he is invoking the Fifth? Or is he refusing to answer for another reason?


12 posted on 05/13/2023 5:27:26 AM PDT by yldstrk (Bingo! We have a winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fella

Citizens can use the 5th amendment but government employees can not.
*******************

Sure they can, if they themselves could be guilty of a crime. But on behalf of their office, you are right, the Fifth can’t be invoked. I doubt this dude is invoking the Fifth; I need further information.


13 posted on 05/13/2023 5:29:37 AM PDT by yldstrk (Bingo! We have a winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota

Congress has no enforcement ability.
But a referral can be made to DOJ.
Of course the current corrupt DOJ will not act on it.
But a future GOP President and his AG
could act on it.


14 posted on 05/13/2023 6:54:52 AM PDT by tennmountainman ( Less Lindell CONS, More AZ Style Audits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

“What I do not respect is the committee’s use of subpoena power to compel me to participate in an act of political theater.”

Look who’s talking about political theater.


15 posted on 05/13/2023 7:18:39 AM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Bold of you to assume there will ever be another GOP president. The democrats figure stealing power one more time should be enough to finish the job of burning the country to it’s foundation.


16 posted on 05/13/2023 10:23:13 AM PDT by pawpawrick (I had a life once but my job ate it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pawpawrick

Yep. Mass Mail Out Ballots To ALL REGISTERED VOTERS.
No copy of ID required when mailing in or muled to a drop box.
No real signature verification.
A recipe for Mass Fraud.


17 posted on 05/13/2023 11:04:43 AM PDT by tennmountainman ( Less Lindell CONS, More AZ Style Audits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: vivenne

Of course...wrong party.


18 posted on 05/13/2023 1:33:54 PM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Does the enforcement of the Subpoena continue after the termination of the Congressional Term?


19 posted on 05/13/2023 1:35:10 PM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota

Good question. I don’t know the answer.


20 posted on 05/13/2023 1:42:24 PM PDT by tennmountainman ( Less Lindell CONS, More AZ Style Audits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson