Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

San Diego man ordered to take down his live cameras pointed at the Bay for 10 YEARS days after they captured two Navy ships nearly colliding in a game of 'Warship Chicken'
daily mail ^

Posted on 05/10/2023 5:55:33 AM PDT by algore

A San Diego man whose livestream captured two U.S. Navy ships nearly colliding in the local harbor has been ordered by the military branch to take the cameras down.

Barry Bahrami says he was told by the Navy Criminal Investigative Service and National Park Service that he cannot have a live stream because it shows military activity in the area.

The man told one local San Diego outlet that his group has been filming for a decade, but was only ordered after the near-miss incident was captured.

'We were there for 10 years and then to suddenly make up a reason to take them down, that's just bologna I don't think anyone believes that,' Bahrami told FOX 5.

'Now we have government censorship simply out of spite because we showed something they didn't like,' Bahrami said

Bahrami runs a group called San Diego Web Cam which provides live stream feeds across the San Diego area.

In November, one of Bahrami's cameras caught two Navy ships in the San Diego Bay nearly colliding in an incident of 'Warship Chicken.'

After the video gained online attention, the National Park Service reached out to him on the Navy's request, instructing him to take the cameras down.

The cameras were positioned at the Cabrillo National Monument in Point Loma

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 05/10/2023 5:55:33 AM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: algore

Put them on private property.

Problem solved.

L


2 posted on 05/10/2023 5:57:41 AM PDT by Lurker ( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

I’m not sure its such a good idea to have cameras broadcasting worldwide activity at a US naval base in real time anyway.


3 posted on 05/10/2023 5:59:12 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Yep


4 posted on 05/10/2023 6:00:10 AM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

It’s not like anyone and the local weatherman can’t have a cam showing local weather over the bay and north island. In today’s day, this ruling by the navy is pointless.


5 posted on 05/10/2023 6:01:51 AM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: algore

If the camera is on public space, I side with the Navy.


6 posted on 05/10/2023 6:09:29 AM PDT by ComputerGuy (Heavily-medicated for your protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44

Probably but I understand their position.


7 posted on 05/10/2023 6:09:56 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: algore

Hey, our woke military is fantastic ... Austin and Milley are doing a fantastic job of surrendering to any country that hates us.


8 posted on 05/10/2023 6:10:32 AM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

“I’m not sure its such a good idea to have cameras broadcasting worldwide activity at a US naval base in real time anyway”.

The Chinese and Russian satellites don’t agree with you.


9 posted on 05/10/2023 6:11:11 AM PDT by laplata (They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: algore

Once they confiscate the guns they will start on cameras.


10 posted on 05/10/2023 6:12:14 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Impossible to prevent someone doing it in secret with today's technology and funding from other states. High resolution live feeds of every single base on earth would cost peanuts compared to reconnaissance missions in the past.

This guy is just getting harassed for widely sharing a Navy f’up

11 posted on 05/10/2023 6:13:29 AM PDT by varyouga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: laplata

Imagine how foolish the Russians and Chinese felt when they realize they could’ve gotten the same info for the cost of an internet subscription.


12 posted on 05/10/2023 6:15:27 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

I think mounting a camera in a permanent location may be an issue. If someone wants to be out there with the camera I don’t think there would be an issue. Who knows though, this could end up in court and he might have a case against government censorship.


13 posted on 05/10/2023 6:16:54 AM PDT by gunnut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

I’m not denying its impracticality I am saying I understand why the navy felt compelled to remove the camera.


14 posted on 05/10/2023 6:17:05 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: algore

I hate cameras everywhere.

As helpful as they have been with crimes and such—I still wish this trend wouldn’t have started.

It is what it is.


15 posted on 05/10/2023 6:25:26 AM PDT by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

If the camera has been there for ten years broad casting on the internet I can not believe that it has escaped the notice of the Navy all of this time.

More than one naval officer knew that the camera was there,

Certainly Navy Intelligence knew it was there.

No, the camera was not a problem until the Navy embarrassed itself for all the world to see.


16 posted on 05/10/2023 6:32:03 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
I’m not sure its such a good idea to have cameras broadcasting worldwide activity at a US naval base in real time anyway.

Yep, best to let out adversaries do that on their own dime. Cameras are tiny, cheap, and plentiful these days.

17 posted on 05/10/2023 6:37:15 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: algore

Our woke Navy is just covering their asses.


18 posted on 05/10/2023 6:50:06 AM PDT by chopperk ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
I’m not sure its such a good idea to have cameras broadcasting worldwide activity at a US naval base in real time anyway.

Is the camera aimed at a US naval base? A screen shot from the video seems to show otherwise.

It looks to me like the camera is aimed at the bay, not the base itself.

As Bahrami says, the camera wasn't a problem until he captured the incident.


19 posted on 05/10/2023 7:04:14 AM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker (For 'tis the sport to have the engineer hoist with his own petard., -- Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: algore

Tell the military to confine it’s operations to drag queens and queers and they can shut the heck up..


20 posted on 05/10/2023 7:04:56 AM PDT by dpetty121263
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson