To: marcusmaximus
The presence of a T-34 is appropriate and historically symbolic. It was instrumental in the defeat of Hitler and NAZI Germany. I would not ridicule the T-34 in this context.
The absence of modern tanks in the parade is another matter.
8 posted on
05/09/2023 2:51:06 PM PDT by
sjmjax
To: sjmjax
To: sjmjax
Yep, that is the big question. Where are they? Are they all being thrown at Ukraine? The Oryx website says of Russian tanks: Tanks (1938, of which destroyed: 1185, damaged: 103, abandoned: 105, captured: 545)
16 posted on
05/09/2023 3:22:12 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(It's science and therefore cannot be questioned!)
To: sjmjax
The other tanks were probably covering the flanks of the 72 motorized fleeing Bahkmut.
32 posted on
05/09/2023 4:07:49 PM PDT by
model B
(attitude is a little thing that makes a big difference -- Sir Winston Churchill)
To: sjmjax
The absence of modern tanks in the parade is another matter.Putting the parade together was a tankless job, but someone had to do it.
34 posted on
05/09/2023 4:27:27 PM PDT by
chajin
("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
