Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump to try to move Manhattan hush money case to federal court
The Hill ^ | 05/04/2023 | ZACH SCHONFELD

Posted on 05/04/2023 9:54:09 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

Former President Trump will try to move his Manhattan criminal hush money case from state to federal court, his lawyer said.

Trump attorney Todd Blanche made the announcement during a court hearing Thursday, according to The Associated Press.

Moving the case to federal court would increase the potential jury pool, which is currently limited to the heavily-Democratic population of Manhattan.

Blanche said Trump’s legal team will file a motion later Thursday to transfer the case, according to the AP.

Trump faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records over his alleged role in a hush money scheme ahead of the 2016 presidential election. He pleaded not guilty.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bscase; federal; manhattan; money; thehill; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Thoughts? Concerns?
1 posted on 05/04/2023 9:54:09 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Out of the pan into the fire!


2 posted on 05/04/2023 9:58:38 AM PDT by Colo9250 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Federal court is no guarantor of the rule of law or a fair and impartial judge/jury.


3 posted on 05/04/2023 9:59:50 AM PDT by sauropod (“If they don’t believe our lies, well, that’s just conspiracy theorist stuff, there.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
The John Edwards case was heard in federal court.

Also, in federal court President Trump can get the case thrown out for statute of limitations. It's Bragg in state court that's trying to force the case despite statute of limitations using an extreme interpretation of New York state statutes that won't apply in federal court.

-PJ

4 posted on 05/04/2023 10:01:03 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Danials signed an NDA. Big deal. “Hush money” sound so much more sinister.... .


5 posted on 05/04/2023 10:02:05 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

“Trump faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records over his alleged role in a hush money scheme ahead of the 2016 presidential election. He pleaded not guilty.”

With no evidence.


6 posted on 05/04/2023 10:18:05 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (The Democrat Party - Dumbing Down America Since 1965.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

They would move it to DC which is even worse.


7 posted on 05/04/2023 10:29:32 AM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

This case was carefully put together to make sure they had the most crooked aspects of the justice system at work. Crooked AG, Crooked Judge, And a cess-pool for the jury. I don’t think its going anywhere.


8 posted on 05/04/2023 10:31:14 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
There is no worse jury than a cherry picked, Trump hating Manhattan jury so there is really nothing to lose here.

And the NDA issue is absurd. Stormy Daniels saw an opportunity to extort money from Donald Trump in the late stages of a close Presidential election. She is a self promoting porn actress and prostitute who has signed a sworn statement denying any relationship with Donald Trump. Not that she has any credibility at all, even for a denial. I seriously doubt that famously germophobe Trump would have sex with that portable STD petri dish, but I could care less either way.

9 posted on 05/04/2023 10:33:21 AM PDT by rdcbn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

In Federal Court, Trump could appeal to Circuit Court, then Supreme Court.

I have to believe at least ONE of these courts is honest and unbiased.

I HAVE to believe that.


10 posted on 05/04/2023 10:37:14 AM PDT by FroggyTheGremlim (I'll be good, I will, I will!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

And then a federal judge can declare him a flight risk and deny him the use of his airplane.


11 posted on 05/04/2023 10:40:21 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Incorrect. He’s charged with state crimes, so the federal court applies the laws of New York. However, since the case is barred by the New York statute of limitations, it should still be tossed


12 posted on 05/04/2023 10:52:21 AM PDT by j.havenfarm (22 years on Free Republic, 12/10/22! more then 6500 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm
He’s charged with state crimes, so the federal court applies the laws of New York.

But the federal court doesn't have to accept Bragg's interpretation of the state laws, which is what is going on here. Nobody believes that Bragg can use a federal campaign law that (1) is past the statute of limitations and (2) was declined to be prosecuted by federal agencies, to bootstrap his state law into a felony crime.

I don't think a federal court would go along with that interpretation, and I don't think they have to accept it just because it's a state law.

-PJ

13 posted on 05/04/2023 11:09:14 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Thoughts? Concerns?

Almost impossible to remove a state criminal case to federal court, and the deadline for even trying has likely passed.

14 posted on 05/04/2023 11:10:06 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Agree.

This move is being made. out of sheer desperation.

Fora billionaire, Trump has the worst lawyers.


15 posted on 05/04/2023 11:21:50 AM PDT by miserare ( "Equity" is the new word for Communism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Smart move. Move to fed court, FEC has exclusive jurisdiction, declines to prosecute, fed charges get dropped, charges get dropped to misdemeanors which the statute of limitations has already expired. All charges dropped.


16 posted on 05/04/2023 12:11:32 PM PDT by taxcontrol (The choice is clear - either live as a slave on your knees or die as a free citizen on your feet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Agreed. I think bragg’s interprets is not correct. My point is that the original post implied that state law would not be applied in federal court


17 posted on 05/04/2023 12:13:54 PM PDT by j.havenfarm (22 years on Free Republic, 12/10/22! more then 6500 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Trump hires some of the dumbest attorneys.


18 posted on 05/04/2023 12:33:48 PM PDT by CodeToad (No Arm up! They have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Trump has very little choice where attorneys are concerned FAR TO MANY attorneys will NEVER represent him, they care far more about their parties and country club events than the LAW!!!


19 posted on 05/04/2023 12:36:09 PM PDT by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm; All

“Incorrect. He’s charged with state crimes, so the federal court applies the laws of New York. However, since the case is barred by the New York statute of limitations, it should still be tossed.”

But Gregg is relying on an essentially federal theory (one he’s carefully avoided disclosing, going so far as not even citing the relevant federal statutes), that the payment to Stormy Daniels violated federal law, a felony, and using that alleged felony to bootstrap himself into the five years statute of limitations. The problem there is that it is federal law, law that is designed to be uniformly applied, rather than willy-nilly by every state. Thus, the federal interpretation of that law should preempt any state interpretation. All the federal authorities who have looked at this have concluded there was no violation. Thus, if Trump’s theory works, there will be no federal felony to bootstrap the state case and the state case will be barred by the two-year statute of limitations. All in all, a very smart move by Trumps attorneys.


20 posted on 05/04/2023 12:37:56 PM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson