Jeez, talk about prejudice.
The trouble is, mRNA "vaccine"s don't walk like a duck. Any rational person knows the mRNA concoction doesn't walk like a duck, doesn't quack like a duck, and doesn't perform like a duck. It's not a "vaccine" just because the suits in marketing say so. If Pfizer et al were proud of its performance, they wouldn't even want to associate it with vaccines. They'd say "it's new!, it's different!, it's a revolution in medicine!, this isn't simply an old-fashioned "vaccine", it's a remarkable, historical departure and a novel approach to medicine, all for the betterment of humanity! It's the mRNA miracle!"
Instead, since they can't sell it as something that will safely stand alone or be of great benefit, they have to piggyback onto something that the general public trusts: "vaccines". Only then can they push their snake oil out the door (for "free") to a gullible public, and that's only possible since they've planted their agents in the regulatory agencies, then greased the palms of the people's elected representatives, conning them into using public funds to pay for just about all of it. It must be nice.
Tellurian wrote: “Instead, since they can’t sell it as something that will safely stand alone or be of great benefit, they have to piggyback onto something that the general public trusts: “vaccines”.”
Now, why would the pharmaceutical companies do that?
Why would the regulators participate in that scheme?
Why would hundred of thousands of medical professionals play along?
Why would the politicians provide the billions of dollars to develop and pay for the vaccines?
Why hasn’t the media jumped all over this?
And, it wasn’t the marketing suits that called it a vaccine. It was the entire medical profession. mRNA techology has been in development for at least 20 years.