Posted on 05/04/2023 6:11:25 AM PDT by Red Badger
The Food and Drug Administration on Wednesday approved the world's first RSV vaccine: a shot for adults ages 60 and up, made by pharmaceutical giant GSK.
The milestone was decades in the making. Researchers first attempted to develop a vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus roughly 60 years ago.
In a late-stage clinical trial, the single-dose shot lowered the risk of symptomatic illness by 83% and of severe illness by 94%.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention must still recommend the vaccine before it becomes available to the public. A CDC advisory committee is scheduled to meet in June to discuss how the shot should be used.
Dr. Phil Dormitzer, GSK’s senior vice president and global head of vaccines research and development, said the company is already manufacturing doses of the vaccine, to be sold under the brand name Arexvy.
“The goal is to have shots available in the fall so that people can get them before the next RSV season coming up late fall and winter,” Dormitzer said, though he did not give specific production numbers.
RSV causes a lower respiratory illness that is typically mild for healthy adults. But in serious cases, the virus can lead to pneumonia or bronchiolitis, which inflames airways and clogs them with mucus. Older people and infants are particularly at risk: RSV kills up to 10,000 people ages 65 or older and up to 300 children under 5 every year in the U.S.
RSV cases typically peak between late December and mid-February, but cases last year started climbing in the summer as people left pandemic precautions behind.
As of late April, the rate of RSV hospitalizations for the current season was around 51 per 100,000 people, according to the CDC. That's up from 19 hospitalizations per 100,000 people by the same point in the prior season.
GSK’s trial showed that protection from its vaccine lasted at least six months.
"It’s not like you have to wait to the very last minute because it’s not going to last long enough," Dormitzer said. "We know from studies we have done that getting a vaccine — for example, in the fall — should cover you through the next RSV season."
Dormitzer said the company's data also suggests it is safe to administer the RSV vaccine at the same time as a standard flu shot. But GSK is still studying whether the vaccine can be administered alongside high-dose or adjuvanted flu vaccines (shots with an added ingredient to encourage a better immune response), which are the types the CDC recommends for older adults.
Monitoring for safety concerns
GSK’s trial is ongoing, so the company plans to keep collecting data over the next two RSV seasons. It will also monitor people who receive the newly approved shot.
So far, commonly reported side effects in the trial include injection site pain, fatigue and muscle pain.
The FDA noted a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm) among vaccine recipients relative to the control group, and it identified one case of Guillain-Barré syndrome — a rare neurological disorder that damages nerve cells and causes muscle weakness or paralysis — that was potentially related to the vaccine.
Dormitzer said it’s hard to know what to make of the Guillain-Barré case but added, “I would not say it’s a great concern at this point.”
A panel of FDA advisers in March voted 10-2 in favor of approving the vaccine based on its safety and unanimously recommended the vaccine based on its efficacy.
The future of RSV vaccines
A second RSV vaccine for older adults, from Pfizer, is up for FDA approval later this month. The FDA advisory panel voted 7-4 to recommend that shot based on its safety and efficacy.
Some members expressed concerns that not enough participants in Pfizer’s trial got infected with RSV to adequately assess the shot’s efficacy, and several worried about a potential association with Guillain-Barré. One man in Pfizer’s trial developed Guillain-Barré after he received the vaccine, and a woman developed Miller Fisher syndrome, a related, rare nerve disease.
The FDA has asked Pfizer to conduct a study on the risk of Guillain-Barré after its vaccine is approved.
Pfizer also tested a second application of its shot in pregnant people to help protect infants from RSV. The FDA is reviewing that data, with a decision likely in August.
Dormitzer said GSK doesn't have further plans to study its shot among pregnant people after a previous trial involving a slightly different version of the vaccine showed a higher preterm birth rate among some vaccine recipients.
However, GSK is studying its shot in people ages 50 to 59 — particularly those with underlying health issues. Dormitzer said that data should be available sometime after July.
Aria Bendix
I know thinking is hard for you, so i’ll type type s l o w l y.
Why would Fauci lie and try to spin it that covid came from bats?
Why was Fauci funding gain of function on coronavirus?
Is covid-19 a coronavirus?
Could making coronaviruses more deadly end up creating covid-19?
Did Ukraine also have biolabs that were said to not exist until it was admitted they did?
Why were Covid-19 tests created before it was released?
Why did Fauci guarantee an outbreak during Trumps first term?
See, idiots like you are a pox on society. You are either grossly ignorant, incredibly stupid or part of the coverup. I’ll accept you just being dumb, but I suspect it’s one of the others.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/26/politics/covid-lab-leak-wuhan-china-intelligence/index.html
https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-origin-china-lab-leak-807b7b0a
So, while the swamp critters (you included) are busy denying it’s possible, lots of evidence is showing it was indeed lab produced/leaked. In my mind the only question is whether it was intentional or an accident. You on the other hand as blowing Fauci as you bend over for the MSM
Related;
How dense do you have to be to watch the entire Covid-19 situation unfold over the last few years and not be the least bit suspicious about what people like Biden and Fauci are telling you? So trusting of them that you go online to defend them.
How gullible do you have to be to sill believe the lies?
How moronic do you have to be to still believe the covid death numbers when we know and THEY HAVE ADMITTED that anyone dying WITH Covid was counted as dying FROM covid? That’s out there as public knowledge but here you are, trying to sell it as an actual number? to steal a phrase from your theoretical boss, C’mon man.
Again, you could be a moron, but I suspect you’re on a mission and are an infiltraitor. (Yes I spelled that as intended).
BlueMondaySkipper wrote: “How dense do you have to be to watch the entire Covid-19 situation unfold over the last few years and not be the least bit suspicious about what people like Biden and Fauci are telling you? So trusting of them that you go online to defend them.”
I am suspicious of Biden/Fauci. I’m more suspicious of people who are claiming that COVID is a conspiracy involving people like Gates et al, to depopulate the world.
BlueMondaySkipper wrote: “How gullible do you have to be to sill believe the lies?”
How gullible do you have to be to believe RFK jr, Robert Young, Gemma O’Doherty and others just because they perpetuate the anti-vaxxer narrative. I almost forget Stella Immanuel who believes demons are impregnating women in their sleep.
BlueMondaySkipper wrote: “How moronic do you have to be to still believe the covid death numbers when we know and THEY HAVE ADMITTED that anyone dying WITH Covid was counted as dying FROM covid? That’s out there as public knowledge but here you are, trying to sell it as an actual number? to steal a phrase from your theoretical boss, C’mon man.”
As I’ve stated previously, that’s false logic. Suppose you push someone with a comorbidity off a cliff. Are you going to tell the judge that you didn’t kill that person because they had high blood pressure?
They’re obvious gov’t plants/trolls.
Dense has nothing to do with it.
“Not this MRNA left wing propaganda anti-science BS.”
The Covid virus itself is composed of mRNA. The natural immunity acquired from catching covid is a product of viral mRNA.
https://byjus.com/neet/difference-between-positive-and-negative-sense-rna-virus/
So is natural immunity “left wing propaganda anti-science BS”?
Or is viral mRNA magically different from scary jab mRNA and therefore safe? Inquiring minds want to know.
“ As I’ve stated previously, that’s false logic. Suppose you push someone with a comorbidity off a cliff. Are you going to tell the judge that you didn’t kill that person because they had high blood pressure?”
You inadvertently made my point. If the body at the bottom of the cliff tested positive it would have indeed been called a covid death. Even though they (like +98% of the rest of us) would have survived Covid.
Another person in the know is showing how the numbers were faked/inflated. Of course your assignment here is to defend the swamp and liars so there’s that…
https://expose-news.com/2023/05/16/drs-lied-cause-death-create-illisuion-covid-pandemic/
DugwayDuke wrote: ““As I’ve stated previously, that’s false logic. Suppose you push someone with a comorbidity off a cliff. Are you going to tell the judge that you didn’t kill that person because they had high blood pressure?”
lueMondaySkipper wrote: “You inadvertently made my point. If the body at the bottom of the cliff tested positive it would have indeed been called a covid death. Even though they (like +98% of the rest of us) would have survived Covid.”
You missed the point. If someone with high blood pressure dies because you pushed them off the cliff, then it is your push that killed them, not their high blood pressure. You keep trying to blame comorbidities for these deaths when it was COVID that pushed them off the cliff.
BTW, there are far better sources of information than the Expose. The Espose is nothing but anti-vaxxer click bait. The Expose relies upon hyperbolic rhetoric to drive their ad revenues. You do realize that their plea for donations, their claims that they will collapse if they don’t get more donations in only 12 days has been at the top of their web page for months?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.