Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

WOW big change at the UN
1 posted on 05/01/2023 8:29:21 PM PDT by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Sunsong

Putin o philes are deeply disturbed


2 posted on 05/01/2023 8:31:02 PM PDT by lonestar67 (America is exceptional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sunsong

UN is a paper tiger. It has no military to enforce any of its resolutions.


3 posted on 05/01/2023 8:31:05 PM PDT by entropy12 (Food is most popular anxiety drug, exercise is the least popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sunsong

They are signaling to their friends and allies within Russia that Putin and his antics have run their course... He must be removed, and likely will be in short order. There must be some sort of poison they can kill him with that will be both painful and debilitating enough to ensure that he dies without the dignity of bullet to the back of his head.

In that way they can slowly transition to somebody else with the common sense to guide Russia towards the freedom they thought they were getting when they abandoned Communism in favor of a freedom that was never truly delivered.


6 posted on 05/01/2023 8:38:24 PM PDT by jerod (Nazi's were essentially Socialist in Hugo Boss uniforms... Get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sunsong

Ha ha. A strongly worded resolution from a globalist cabal means what? (Just poking fun at the UN. Russia is corrupt and evil, just like Ukraine and all its supporters.)


9 posted on 05/01/2023 8:41:32 PM PDT by ConservativeInPA ("How did you go bankrupt?" Bill asked. "Two ways," Mike said. "Gradually and then suddenly." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sunsong

Not really. They are positioning to be the broker of the cease fire which will drive DC deranged and make them look good in front of the world.

Chinese are chess. You are checkers.


13 posted on 05/01/2023 8:44:26 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sunsong

“It’s a Trap!!”


15 posted on 05/01/2023 8:45:47 PM PDT by doorgunner69 (Let's go Brandon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sunsong

Meh, the resolution is typical diplomatic weasel-worded lawyer talk… doesn’t really mean anything other than “we believe in peace, human rights, blah blah blah”.


20 posted on 05/01/2023 9:00:33 PM PDT by CapandBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sunsong

It is just really new ukies fake. here is a link: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/N23/116/57/PDF/N2311657.pdf?OpenElement

There is 3 strings in preamble but NOT in declaring text.

“...Recognizing also that the unprecedented challenges now facing Europe following the aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine, and against Georgia prior to that, and the cessation of the membership of the Russian Federation in the Council of Europe..”

That is it. NOTHING else about Russia in this resolution at all.

SO ukies tell again a fairy tale.


24 posted on 05/01/2023 9:06:50 PM PDT by nickfrost1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sunsong

“WOW big change at the UN”

Wake me up when they impose SANCTIONS on Russia...otherwise it’s just a meaningless vote.


27 posted on 05/01/2023 9:27:57 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sunsong

Hiding land mines inside children’s toys in their homes must be disturbing to the Chicoms.


28 posted on 05/01/2023 9:30:02 PM PDT by gitmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sunsong

It is a ukie fake. Here is a message of Russia representative in UN Dmitrij Polanskij.

The Goooge translation: “..Here, some Ukrainian publics began to disperse the “peremoga” about the fact that our key partners voted for a resolution condemning “Russian aggression”. I consider it necessary to clarify.

This is not about another “thematic” resolution within the framework of the special session launched in connection with the start of our NWO, but about the annual and routine resolution on UN cooperation with the Council of Europe (CE) that was voted in the General Assembly on April 26. In order to better understand the context, it should be clarified that the resolutions on UN cooperation with regional organizations adopted at various intervals have always been consensual and, for this, were of a very general nature and have never been politicized. There are many such organizations and various countries of the world are interested in supporting “their” regional organizations. A similar order existed until recently and was violated - guess who? That’s right, Ukraine!

In the preamble of the next UN-CE resolution, Ukrainians and Westerners introduced an extremely politicized paragraph (PP9), which is not related to the subject of the resolution. This move put many states in an awkward position. After all, if they do not support this resolution, the Westerners can pay back in kind when voting on the resolutions they need. Many of our partners - in the CIS, BRICS and so on - have found themselves in this situation. Therefore, they did the following: they did not support this paragraph in a separate vote, but voted for the entire text, while making interpretive statements that they did not support the politicization of the resolution on UN cooperation with humanitarian organizations.

Ukrainians and Westerners, of course, try not to emphasize these nuances, but for those who work in the UN, everything is very clear. Ukraine “achieved” that a) the consensus resolution became non-consensual (71 countries did not support it, but all could support it) b) 81 countries supported the anti-Russian paragraph during a separate vote, and did not support 102, which once again indicates a decrease in support for Ukraine at the UN c) many UN members condemned the Ukrainian methods of politicization of everything and everyone into the microphone.

So hurt or win? Decide for yourself!..”
https://t.me/dpol_un/525


29 posted on 05/01/2023 9:35:37 PM PDT by nickfrost1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sunsong

The basic reason China supported this is to assert its “territorial rights” over Taiwan.


36 posted on 05/01/2023 10:45:04 PM PDT by rfp1234 (E Porcibus Unum )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sunsong

Hmmm...Zelensky speaks to Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch for an hour (reportedly threatened to add them to his “blacklist”)...3 days later Tucker is fired. Zelensky speaks to Xi for an hour...3 days later China opposes Russia in UN. Zyyy sure seems to have a lot of leverage to swing around.


38 posted on 05/01/2023 11:02:54 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sunsong

Smoke and mirrors.


42 posted on 05/02/2023 6:33:04 AM PDT by Pirate Ragnar (Be calm and act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sunsong

Hardly. Just a strongly-worded letter with multiple signatures. All that’s different is that China also joined them, dissing Putin.


51 posted on 05/02/2023 1:14:52 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (Every Goliath has his David. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson