Posted on 05/01/2023 8:29:21 PM PDT by Sunsong
"China, India, Brazil and several other states close to Russia have unexpectedly voted for a UN Resolution which strongly censures Moscow.
"On April 26, China unexpectedly voted in favor of a UN resolution that acknowledges Russia's military aggression against Ukraine and emphasizes the need to respect the independence and territorial integrity of all states...
"...Recognizing also that the unprecedented challenges now facing Europe following the aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine, and against Georgia prior to that, and the cessation of the membership of the Russian Federation in the Council of Europe, call for strengthened cooperation between the United Nations and the Council of Europe, notably in order to promptly restore and maintain peace and security based on respect of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of any State, ensure the observance of human rights and international humanitarian law during the hostilities, provide redress to victims and bring to justice all those responsible for the violations of international law..."
(Excerpt) Read more at kyivpost.com ...
Good grief, who said China’s words would win the war?
China has changed their position. That alone is a big deal, imo.
Let’s see what happens in the next few months...
I’m just repeating this coz it says so much:
“Yeah Russia doesn’t care if it’s humiliated and undercut by all the greatest powers on earth - including its military ally China.
We all know Putin is so brilliant he doesn’t care if he loses support.
In fact we all know that every setback for pos Russia is meaningless. Russia is invincible, great economy, brilliant leaders, etc.
/s”
thanks
I predict, in the next few months more of Ukraine buildings, infra-structure and power stations will suffer missile attacks.
We can compare notes in July.
It is just really new ukies fake. here is a link: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/N23/116/57/PDF/N2311657.pdf?OpenElement
There is 3 strings in preamble but NOT in declaring text.
“...Recognizing also that the unprecedented challenges now facing Europe following the aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine, and against Georgia prior to that, and the cessation of the membership of the Russian Federation in the Council of Europe..”
That is it. NOTHING else about Russia in this resolution at all.
SO ukies tell again a fairy tale.
Yeah Russia doesn’t care if it’s humiliated and undercut by all the greatest powers on earth - including its military ally China.==
It is NOT a fact but ukie fake.
the chinese are not chess.
they are GO.
we are clueless. somewhere between checkers and tiddly winks.
“WOW big change at the UN”
Wake me up when they impose SANCTIONS on Russia...otherwise it’s just a meaningless vote.
Hiding land mines inside children’s toys in their homes must be disturbing to the Chicoms.
It is a ukie fake. Here is a message of Russia representative in UN Dmitrij Polanskij.
The Goooge translation: “..Here, some Ukrainian publics began to disperse the “peremoga” about the fact that our key partners voted for a resolution condemning “Russian aggression”. I consider it necessary to clarify.
This is not about another “thematic” resolution within the framework of the special session launched in connection with the start of our NWO, but about the annual and routine resolution on UN cooperation with the Council of Europe (CE) that was voted in the General Assembly on April 26. In order to better understand the context, it should be clarified that the resolutions on UN cooperation with regional organizations adopted at various intervals have always been consensual and, for this, were of a very general nature and have never been politicized. There are many such organizations and various countries of the world are interested in supporting “their” regional organizations. A similar order existed until recently and was violated - guess who? That’s right, Ukraine!
In the preamble of the next UN-CE resolution, Ukrainians and Westerners introduced an extremely politicized paragraph (PP9), which is not related to the subject of the resolution. This move put many states in an awkward position. After all, if they do not support this resolution, the Westerners can pay back in kind when voting on the resolutions they need. Many of our partners - in the CIS, BRICS and so on - have found themselves in this situation. Therefore, they did the following: they did not support this paragraph in a separate vote, but voted for the entire text, while making interpretive statements that they did not support the politicization of the resolution on UN cooperation with humanitarian organizations.
Ukrainians and Westerners, of course, try not to emphasize these nuances, but for those who work in the UN, everything is very clear. Ukraine “achieved” that a) the consensus resolution became non-consensual (71 countries did not support it, but all could support it) b) 81 countries supported the anti-Russian paragraph during a separate vote, and did not support 102, which once again indicates a decrease in support for Ukraine at the UN c) many UN members condemned the Ukrainian methods of politicization of everything and everyone into the microphone.
So hurt or win? Decide for yourself!..”
https://t.me/dpol_un/525
Good point. And the people celebrating, thinking Xi has turned on Russia. I can only marvel at such wide-eyed innocence. It’s no wonder those Nigerian Prince scams actually work.
we disagree. this is not nothing:
“...Recognizing also that the unprecedented challenges now facing Europe following the aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine, and against Georgia prior to that, and the cessation of the membership of the Russian Federation in the Council of Europe..”
this is a change in China’s stance:
“the aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine”
Again, let’s see what happens in the next few months
this is a change in China’s stance:
“the aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine”==
Again it is just NOT true. Read the explanation Dmitri Polanski above.
Dmitri Polanski is a russian diplomat. His words have no meaning
Why would the chinese communist party want a “democratic” Russia?
Dmitri Polanski is a russian diplomat. His words have no meaning==
You may not believe him but there are a real votings of countries he mentioned. That is a change of ukie story isn’t it?
The basic reason China supported this is to assert its “territorial rights” over Taiwan.
Hmmm...Zelensky speaks to Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch for an hour (reportedly threatened to add them to his “blacklist”)...3 days later Tucker is fired. Zelensky speaks to Xi for an hour...3 days later China opposes Russia in UN. Zyyy sure seems to have a lot of leverage to swing around.
the chinese are not chess.
The world chess champion is Ding Liren of China.
My theory is this... The hardline Communist in China do not like democracy for China... But their children and grandchildren do like making money off democratic countries, travelling to democratic countries, etc... The old Commies like to keep those children in check, so they have these ‘Chinese police stations’ set up in democratic countries to insure that their children and grandchildren tow the Communist line.
They have ‘police stations’ throughout the USA, Canada, Europe, etc. and they likely have them in Russia... And the kids in Russia are missing their McDonald’s and they are especially missing their KFC. Just a theory.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.