I liked this one:
The 2020 election was the most rigged election in history. There is no question the DNC like always received billions of dollars of free advertisement while they were also hiding the laptop to make sure not to embarrass the Biden Crime Family in the middle of an election. It was rigged from top to bottom and 2024 is setting up to be the same thing again.
.............................
Here's my summation of the Dominion vs. Fox case that wound up with FNC donating to Dominion and the DNC,IMHO.
'm finishing up on Dominion vs. Fox.
What I'm thinking is that the democrats are all about control.They basically control America now. Open borders, crazy spending,high interest rates, war on oil,war on conservatives,on and on. That's a lot of power,a lot of control.
They have that power because they won the electionsThey won by cheating. The biggest cheat and the most important cheat was electronic. Could have been up to 19%. For the most part that was accomplished with Dominion machines.
Dominion inc. was a 40 million dollar in sales company in 2021. That's chump change for the dirty dems. Are the commie dems going to risk losing their power, their control which they get largely and finally through Dominion with a small assed company. Or, are they going to control them no matter what it takes?
My guess is that they control Dominion and basically told them: you guys get half, we get half, the lawyers get "X" number of bucks and we make sure you win.
As for Rupert Murdoch,owner of Fox inc. he likely had to pay off the dems to appease his family of libs especially james and his wife and who knows what kind of threats he was under.
Fox inc. had over 4 billion in cash. They could afford to lose 787.5 million,write it off, make the donation to the dems which is what it basically was,keep everyone else happy in the family while hiding what they were doing from FNC viewers pretending it was a big loss. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/04/its-a-settlement-that-never-should-have-happened-something-else-had-to-have-been-involved-harvard-professor-and-attorney-dershowitz-on-fox-settlement-with-dominion/ “
It's a Settlement That Never Should Have Happened…Something Else Had to Have Been Involved.” –
Harvard Professor and Attorney Dershowitz on FOX Settlement with Dominion Above is the headline from Gateway no telling who gave it to them. So the fix was in and likely it happened in a sordid fashion maybe as I have told it above hard to say.
1,150 posted on 4/23/2023, 2:50:29 AM by rodguy911 (HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE!! ITS ALL A CONSPIRACY: UNTIL ITS NOT) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1101 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
Dominion was a 40 million dollar company in 2021. That’s chump change for the dirty dems...and now as an 800 million dollar company they’ve the chops to “do it right”in 2024
thats enough simoleans to buy every secretary of state in all 50 states..with some left over for taking care of a Dudley Do Right legislature or judiciary
Faux played it both ways. Get viewership by faking they are the last bastion of truth , while driftng to the left slowly but surely.
Agree the settlement was air cover to further kill and pinkish the truth from ever coming out
It’s the perfect ploy to take the focus off ballot harvesting and stuffing as those now could be lumped into conspiracy theory .
And as reported Mike Lindell punished for 5 million on what may have been bogus info he allegedly used but even if not the air cover of kook/conspirator established to protect 2024.
Fox NeverTrump News is no different than CNN when it comes to the News.
Big Picture, 2022 Midterm Elections Highlight the Distinct Difference Between Ballots and Votes
As the political discussion centers on the 2022 wins and losses from the midterm election, one thing that stands out in similarity to the 2020 general election is the difference between ballots and votes. It appears in some states this is the ‘new normal.’
Where votes were the focus, the Biden administration suffered losses. Where ballots were the focus, the Biden administration won.
Since the advent of ballot centric focus through mail-in and collection drop-off processes, votes have become increasingly less valuable amid the organizers who wish to control election outcomes. As a direct and specific result, ballot collection has become the key to Democrat party success.
The effort to attain votes for candidates is less important than the strategy of collecting ballots.
It should be emphasized; these are two distinctly different election systems.
The system of ballot distribution and collection is far more susceptible to control than the traditional system of votes cast at precincts.
A vote cannot be cast by a person who is no longer alive, or no longer lives in the area. However, a ballot can be sent, completed and returned regardless of the status of the initially attributed and/or registered individual.
While ballots and votes originate in two totally different processes, the end result of both “ballots” and “votes,” weighing on the presented election outcome, is identical.
While initially the ballot form of election control was tested in Deep Blue states, through the process of mail-in returns under the guise and justification of “expanding democracy,” a useful tool for those who are vested in the distinction, I think we are now starting to see what happens on a national level when the process is expanded.
The controversial 2020 election showed the result of making ‘ballots’ the strategy for electoral success. Under the justification of COVID-19 mitigation, mail-in ballots took center stage. Ballot harvesting by Democrat operations was one term for the outcome.
Democrat party officials and political activist groups knew how to exploit the opportunities within the new system of ballot distribution and collection, and when you combine that with a massive legal pressure campaign to accept any and all forms of ballots, well, you can see how they are dependent.
Now that ballot collection has been shown to be a much more effective way to maintain political power, Democrats in a general sense are less focused on winning votes and more focused on gathering ballots.
When ‘ballot organization’ becomes more important than ‘vote winning,’ you modify your electoral campaign approaches accordingly. It might sound simplistic, but inside the distinct difference between ballots and votes you will find why refusing debates is a successful strategy.
If you are trying to win votes you could never fathom campaign success by refusing to debate an opponent. However, if your focus is centered around ballot collection, the debate is essentially irrelevant.
It’s time for voters to start seeing the difference between elections decided by ballots and elections decided by votes. Perhaps the 2022 midterm election will awaken people to the two completely different electioneering systems.
You can vote at any scale you want. However, when ballots are more important than votes – the election will always favor the former.