Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Prolixus
If E. Jean Carroll has a DNA sample from her alleged rapist why doesn’t she have it analyzed

The DNA sample in a vacuum doesn’t mean too much in a sexual assault case. Although you can prove race, gender etc you can’t prove that it is the defendant’s DNA without his sample. Typically, you compare a DNA sample with another DNA sample(s) that is taken separately from the original DNA sample.

18 posted on 04/21/2023 1:24:00 PM PDT by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: thegagline

The DNA sample is alleged to be evidence from a rape.

It doesn’t need to prove anything. It could either rule Donald Trump in or out as a possible source.

Since doing this would be so easy to do, assume DNA analysis has already be run on the sample (if it really exists) and the result doesn’t lead to Donald Trump.


19 posted on 04/21/2023 1:34:39 PM PDT by Prolixus (In all seriousness:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: thegagline

He is smart not to give a DNA sample. She could have obtained a casual contact sample (some one bumped into him at a party and sold her the sample). Make her prove the sample was promptly registered with the police and in their custody documented.


27 posted on 04/21/2023 3:12:29 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Biden not only suffers fools and criminals, he appoints them to positions of responsibility. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson