The DNA sample is alleged to be evidence from a rape.
It doesn’t need to prove anything. It could either rule Donald Trump in or out as a possible source.
Since doing this would be so easy to do, assume DNA analysis has already be run on the sample (if it really exists) and the result doesn’t lead to Donald Trump.
That is not how DNA samples generally work. Have you ever acted as an attorney in a sexual assault or a child custody case? I’m guessing not. In a civil case, the DNA found of the garment is compared with that of the defendant’s DNA.In this case, Trump refused to provide his DNA for over 3 years. So the plaintiff had nothing to compare the DNA found on her dress with.
Ot was explained in post #1 that Trump was asked to provide a DNAvsample and refused.
I am surprised she has a sample from the allged rape...