Skip to comments.
Trump can’t blame ‘burdens’ on NYC for not attending his trial for sexual assault: judge
The New York Post ^
| 04/21/2023
| Ben Feureherd
Posted on 04/21/2023 12:32:29 PM PDT by thegagline
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Trial starts next week. Keep in mind that for 3 years the plaintiff E Jean Carroll requested that Trump provide a DNA sample to compare it with her stained dress. And for 3 years, while discovering was open, Trump refused to provide the DNA sample which potentially could have been inculpatory or exculpatory.
Trial begins on April 25th
To: thegagline
We do not have a legal system. It is just a weapon of the democrat party to attack its enemies.
2
posted on
04/21/2023 12:37:37 PM PDT
by
joma89
(Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
To: thegagline
I wouldn’t give MY DNA to anyone either-—unless compelled
To: thegagline
my question is why is this trial being held in federal court and not state court???
4
posted on
04/21/2023 12:46:04 PM PDT
by
markman46
(engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
To: thegagline
5
posted on
04/21/2023 12:47:14 PM PDT
by
Bratch
To: markman46
“my question is why is this trial being held in federal court and not state court???”
Good question.
To: thegagline
You should post this over at DU. They need some good news.
7
posted on
04/21/2023 12:53:42 PM PDT
by
McGruff
(Don't underestimate Joe's ability to f*** things up - Barack Obama)
To: markman46
my question is why is this trial being held in federal court and not state court??? Diversity jurisdiction: amount of controversy is over $75,000 and the plaintiff and defendant are citizens from different states.
8
posted on
04/21/2023 12:55:03 PM PDT
by
thegagline
(Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024)
To: thegagline
That woman is butt ugly.
Even if President Trump were as blind as Stevie Wonder, there’d be no way in hell he would come within 10 feet of her.
9
posted on
04/21/2023 1:01:10 PM PDT
by
2CAVTrooper
(Freedom is the sure possession of those alone who have the courage to defend it.)
To: joma89
What the he!! happened to the Statute of Limitations?
10
posted on
04/21/2023 1:07:32 PM PDT
by
Thommas
(The snout of the camel is already under the tent.)
To: 2CAVTrooper
That woman is butt ugly. Even if President Trump were as blind as Stevie Wonder, there’d be no way in hell he would come within 10 feet of her.Here is Trump within 3 feet of her
11
posted on
04/21/2023 1:07:38 PM PDT
by
thegagline
(Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024)
To: Thommas
What the he!! happened to the Statute of Limitations? This defamation case is within the statute of limitations.
12
posted on
04/21/2023 1:09:03 PM PDT
by
thegagline
(Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024)
To: thegagline
If E. Jean Carroll has a DNA sample from her alleged rapist why doesn’t she have it analyzed?
It’s 2023 and she is very well funded. This should be no problem and could provide evidence that could either include or exclude Donald Trump as the source.
Still would prove rape though.
13
posted on
04/21/2023 1:13:23 PM PDT
by
Prolixus
(In all seriousness:)
To: Prolixus
Correction: wouldn’t prove rape
14
posted on
04/21/2023 1:14:14 PM PDT
by
Prolixus
(In all seriousness:)
To: 2CAVTrooper
She alleges this happened in late 1995/early 1996—28 years ago. She is 79 now. She was ~50-51 then.
15
posted on
04/21/2023 1:16:56 PM PDT
by
bootless
(Is life so dear or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it!)
To: thegagline
16
posted on
04/21/2023 1:17:36 PM PDT
by
vivenne
To: thegagline
Looks like they are at a party with a lot of people and someone took a picture. I don’t think that situation has ever happened to anyone before.
17
posted on
04/21/2023 1:19:54 PM PDT
by
vivenne
To: Prolixus
If E. Jean Carroll has a DNA sample from her alleged rapist why doesn’t she have it analyzed The DNA sample in a vacuum doesn’t mean too much in a sexual assault case. Although you can prove race, gender etc you can’t prove that it is the defendant’s DNA without his sample. Typically, you compare a DNA sample with another DNA sample(s) that is taken separately from the original DNA sample.
18
posted on
04/21/2023 1:24:00 PM PDT
by
thegagline
(Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024)
To: thegagline
The DNA sample is alleged to be evidence from a rape.
It doesn’t need to prove anything. It could either rule Donald Trump in or out as a possible source.
Since doing this would be so easy to do, assume DNA analysis has already be run on the sample (if it really exists) and the result doesn’t lead to Donald Trump.
19
posted on
04/21/2023 1:34:39 PM PDT
by
Prolixus
(In all seriousness:)
To: Prolixus
result doesn’t lead to Donald Trump. That is not how DNA samples generally work. Have you ever acted as an attorney in a sexual assault or a child custody case? I’m guessing not. In a civil case, the DNA found of the garment is compared with that of the defendant’s DNA.In this case, Trump refused to provide his DNA for over 3 years. So the plaintiff had nothing to compare the DNA found on her dress with.
20
posted on
04/21/2023 1:58:05 PM PDT
by
thegagline
(Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson