[Alberta's Child]

The vote-counting machines probably worked just fine. It's just that they were counting many -- probably several million -- ballots that had been cast fraudulently. That's why none of the results changed even with multiple independently conducted recounts.

I've been saying this since November 2020. It's amazing how many people are too dull to figure this out even more than two years later -- while they're still waiting for Sidney Powell to release her stupid "Kracken."

[dpetty121263]

It’s the servers that matter, the machines are just dumb terminals more or less. It’s who manages the servers that is critical as data can be doctored and in most cases is.

[Religion and Politics]

The vote-counting machines probably worked just fine. It's just that they were counting many -- probably several million -- ballots that had been cast fraudulently. That's why none of the results changed even with multiple independently conducted recounts.

I've been saying this since November 2020. It's amazing how many people are too dull to figure this out even more than two years later -- while they're still waiting for Sidney Powell to release her stupid "Kracken."

Yep. Once in the batch, always in the batch during recounting. The electronic tabulation was not the problem. I don't even think running the same ballot through multiple times resulted in any count accuracy problems, but that is just my tech self understanding how ballot counting ought to be done and presuming it to be so.