That Breger stuff sounded pretty damning to me. Easily verified or disproven (if one is so inclined), and relatively straightforward to understand.
I’m not interested so much in the style as the substance. What is the Arizona legislature doing about the substance, presuming it is true? If it is not true, then is there a convenient link to a credible rebuttal?
I am very concerned about those charged not having to lift a finger to rebut the claims. Are the claims true? If they are not true, those implicated should categorically deny the claims.
Was there any denial?
I am as perplexed as you are.
Those charges were given in a quiet, professional way and they appeared to me to be positively DAMNING.
I haven’t heard or read anything since Breger gave her testimony.
DID I, ALONG WITH OTHERS, MISS THE BULLETIN THAT SAID IT WAS ALL UNTRUE?
Sum Ting Wong...here.
Here is what appears to be an early news article which seems to outline the defense against the Breger allegations:
Basically, it says that (1) no court charges (eg bribery) have been filed concerning the allegations; (2) Harris disobeyed rules by impugning the reputation of other legislators with “unfounded” allegations of bribery; (3) other members of the committee were supposed to have received advance notice of the remarks, but did not, in violation of committee rules; and (4) other legislators are backing away from supporting Harris, and Harris is in danger of losing her membership in a committee.
Apparently so far no one in the court system has been able to bring charges against any of the legislators involved. This allows the defense in public that the charges are “conspiracy theories.”