Posted on 04/17/2023 4:52:49 PM PDT by CFW
The Arizona House voted 46-13 to expel State Rep. Liz Harris (R-Chandler) on Wednesday after conducting an investigation into her bringing a witness to testify to the Senate Elections Committee, who accused legislators and other public officials of committing crimes. Jacqueline Breger told the committee that Democratic Governor Katie Hobbs, State House Speaker Ben Toma (R-Peoria) and others executed fraudulent deeds as part of a bribery scheme involving the Sinaloa drug cartel, along with other accusations.
Various legislators say that Harris was not truthful when she said she did not know what Breger was going to say. But Harris told The Arizona Sun Times it wasn’t that she didn’t know about the criminal accusations – she had instructed Breger only to address election integrity.
After the explosive testimony in February, State Rep. Stephanie Stahl Hamilton (D-Tucson) submitted a complaint about Harris on March 6 to the House Ethics Committee, which is chaired by State Rep. Joseph Chaplik (R-Scottsdale). Hamilton alleged that Harris violated House Rule 1, which prohibits impugning other members. Chaplik led an investigation, held an evidentiary hearing, and issued a report from the five-member committee unanimously finding that Harris had violated the rule and committed “disorderly behavior.”
(Excerpt) Read more at arizonasuntimes.com ...
I’m starting to really hate “Republicans”.
My two reps, one of whom is a Republican, voted to oust her. So much for courage.
So, 46 are corrupt, and only 13 aren’t?
Thou protests too much, example. There is a there, there.
It seems fair to ask if there could be a "Cartel" involved.
Not that one lives in Arizona, or knows a whole lot about that kinda stuff.
She deserved it for that Breger fiasco. What a moron to buy into that shit.
Will they get almost immediately reinstated, like those insurrectionist Democrats in Tennessee?
I’m surprised she managed to stay this long... or even still breathes.
McTurd is smiling from Hell.
That Breger stuff sounded pretty damning to me. Easily verified or disproven (if one is so inclined), and relatively straightforward to understand.
I’m not interested so much in the style as the substance. What is the Arizona legislature doing about the substance, presuming it is true? If it is not true, then is there a convenient link to a credible rebuttal?
It’s only a conspiracy until it’s true.
The Federal Reserve Is now In The Business Of MONEY LAUNDERING’’. Sinaloa Cartel ….. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PhAtIpf4sk8
Amazing how no one wants to find out if any of it’s true.
Hope the lady has some proof.
I’m voting that the Sinaloa drug cartel owns the state government in Arizona.
So, are the alegations true?
Do you have evidence that that it was not true? I’m not a ‘tard, anything will do for the sake of discussion. Anecdotal, common sense, empirical, anything?
“Amazing how no one wants to find out if any of it’s true.”
Good point. That always kinda’ gives it away, doesn’t it?
You really think the Mexican mafias would not or have not gone that far?
they literally own the entire Mexican government and police top to bottom, and nobody will dispute that. You think Arizona politicians are immune?
Breger may have gone over the top. Doubt that Rogers is in on the game. But walk into any Title office in Phoenix and Tucson and tell me who the footsoldiers are: Leticia, Maria, Yolanda...and they all have “mi tio eduardo”...from Obregon. The handler.
You need to open your eyes and see what’s around you.
Awaiting all the reporting about our very democracy is at stake over this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.