This is an interesting development.
1 posted on
04/17/2023 9:29:58 AM PDT by
CFW
To: CFW
The taxpayers should NOT be subsidizing any of em....
IF they’re soooo good, let em stand on their own and openly compete in a free market.
2 posted on
04/17/2023 9:33:20 AM PDT by
lgjhn23
("On the 8th day, Satan created the progressive liberal to destroy all the good that God created...")
To: CFW
The only bad news is that we’re subsidizing EVs in the first place.
3 posted on
04/17/2023 9:35:05 AM PDT by
cymbeline
To: CFW
4 posted on
04/17/2023 9:35:11 AM PDT by
rktman
(Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
To: CFW
Subsidized on the manufacturing side and subsidized on the purchasing side because there is no cost/benefit analysis that makes sense otherwise.
5 posted on
04/17/2023 9:39:58 AM PDT by
Erik Latranyi
(This is the end of the Republic....because we could not keep it.)
To: CFW
Impossible to cut China out of the EV battery supply chains.
The Dems are only trying to help UNION MEMEBERS. They did this when they got mad at Toyota when obama was president and fabricated a big recall. Seems they like to target non-union foreign-owned competitors. That’s how they get them to comply with their demands.
6 posted on
04/17/2023 9:41:04 AM PDT by
boycott
To: CFW
I’m OK with EVs, but they should never have had subsidies.
13 posted on
04/17/2023 10:39:05 AM PDT by
TangoLimaSierra
(⭐⭐To the Left, The Truth is Right Wing Violence⭐⭐)
To: CFW
This is basically “Cash for Clunkers” with different window dressing.
15 posted on
04/17/2023 10:57:57 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("I've just pissed in my pants and nobody can do anything about it." -- Major Fambrough)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson