Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another Federal Judge Rejects the DOJ's Argument That Cannabis Consumers Have No Second Amendment Rights
Reason ^ | April 11, 2023 | Jacob Sullum

Posted on 04/12/2023 7:56:58 AM PDT by Twotone

A federal judge in Texas recently agreed with a federal judge in Oklahoma that the national ban on gun possession by cannabis consumers violates the Second Amendment. Kathleen Cardone, a judge on the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, also concluded that the federal ban on transferring firearms to an "unlawful user" of a "controlled substance," first imposed by the Gun Control Act of 1968, is unconstitutional.

The case involves Paola Connelly, who was charged with illegal possession of firearms under 18 USC 922(g)(3) after El Paso police found marijuana and guns in her home while responding to a domestic disturbance in December 2021. Connelly, who said she used marijuana "to sleep at night and to help her with anxiety," also was charged with violating 18 USC 922(d)(3) by transferring guns to her husband, a cocaine and psilocybin user. Both gun offenses are punishable by up to 15 years in prison.

As a preliminary matter, Cardone held that Connelly's Second Amendment claims were not precluded by prior decisions in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, which includes Texas, upheld Section 922(g)(3). Those decisions, she noted, preceded the Supreme Court's June 2022 ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which said gun control laws must be "consistent with the Nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation."

Last February in United States v. Rahimi, the 5th Circuit concluded that Bruen required it to reconsider decisions upholding the federal ban on gun possession by people subject to domestic violence restraining orders. By the same logic, Cardone says in an order published last week, the 5th Circuit's precedents regarding Section 922(g)(3) are no longer binding.

(Excerpt) Read more at reason.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2a; 53to47; banglist; bruen; cannabis; doj; donutwatch; dubyajudge; federalistsociety; kathleencardone; marijuana; patrickrwyrick; patrickwyrick; trumpjudge; voicevote; wdoklahoma; wdtexas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: KEVLAR
Indeed, no rights for anyone who has ever consumed a beer or glass of wine either. /s

That makes zero sense - that action doesn't cause permanent brain damage making the user more prone to uninhibited violent actions as regular marijuana use does.

21 posted on 04/12/2023 2:50:38 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

False all around.


22 posted on 04/12/2023 5:59:33 PM PDT by KEVLAR ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

THAT - is complete BS. You should study the topic before you puke that nonsense.


23 posted on 04/12/2023 6:32:15 PM PDT by paulcissa (Politicians want you unarmed so they can control you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Reefer madness bs


24 posted on 04/12/2023 6:34:06 PM PDT by Fuzz (. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson