Replies

It’s an insult to those peoples to conclude that a flying saucer must have showed up and done it for them.

I think the ones who insult them the most are the archeaologists who insist that they worked solely with sticks and stone chisels to carve out giant granite obelisks and things of the sort. They clearly had other tools or indeed it would be impossible within a single lifetime (we're talking about tombs in many cases so one lifetime is relevant). They consider the ancients to be kind of dumb. But whenever they find an artifact or structure that raises a question about that basic presumption, they declare it a religious item with no evidence or followup and move on like it doesn't exist.

There's much more to the ancients than we know. I don't buy much of the explanations of modern archaeologists as 'the truth' nor do I believe aliens came in and did it all.

I think the ones who insult them the most are the archeaologists who insist that they worked solely with sticks and stone chisels to carve out giant granite obelisks and things of the sort.

I agree. Too many sophisticated tool marks left behind on ancient artifacts. And Egyptian archaeologists that will destroy or hide artifacts and tools that predate Egyptian peoples, that show the Egyptians came upon the artifacts later and their culture were inferior in regards to building. Newer construction was inferior, ancient construction can't be duplicated.

Tool marks show signs of lasers, computer-alignment, diamond drills etc. I believe a cataclysm many thousands of years ago happened world-wide that wiped out knowledge and talented artisans, except for monolithic builds such as the pyramids etc.