Posted on 04/07/2023 12:30:23 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Russian forces have likely seized the center of the hotly contested city of Bakhmut, where they are threatening an essential supply route for Ukrainian forces in the west, British intelligence said Friday.
The eastern city is one of the last urban areas of Donetsk that has withstood Russian incursion. Now mostly reduced to rubble, the city center has been the focus of intense fighting for months.
“Ukraine’s key 0506 supply route to the west of the town is likely severely threatened,” the British intelligence update warned.
Ukrainian military expert Vladyslav Selezniov previously said that forces will have to retreat if the ability to get supplies in and wounded soldiers out is further compromised.
“The situation is difficult, the enemy is concentrating maximum efforts to capture Bakhmut. However [Ukraine] is suffering serious losses and not reaching strategic success,” Eastern Military Command spokesperson Serhiy Cherevatyi told Reuters.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
poor writing. What he is trying to say is the supply route to Bakhmut is being threatened. And without it the soldiers in Bakhmut are at great risk for no strategic gain at this point.
Words are just words. I prefer to look and compare the maps, both Russian MOD, Ukie zmOD, and Western. Both are close, the only problem with the western maps is they “ lag”, ie, the western maps failed to show the fall of Soledar for 5-7 days.
Dima on You Tube - the Military Summary Channel is best, using both maps, BUT he monitors in theatre channels, news, reports , video, they confirm much- all that the west ignores.
As stated , we can see Bakmut is all but steamrolled, Avidivka next, high Russian priority to stop the Ukie artillery that has shelled Donetsk since 2015.
Live video from the Russian social sites now show a huge increase of “ Odessa Next” banners popping up all across the Federation….no loss of resolve from the Russian population, no matter what the corrupted western MSM will have you believe.
Russia does rightly view this war as a war with NATO and the West. That fact alone points to Russia accomplishing its goals, bankrupting the collective West, dividing and bleeding them White.
Rationalization is alive and well, living in a Neocon’s brain.
“it will need NATO”
Anyone who thinks NATO will show up in the Pacific when the SHTF is smoking crack.
They won’t. In spite of treaty.
None of them, excepting those who accidentally get caught there.
It will be the US, Japan, Taiwan, Korea and Australia.
Zeepers not gonna like it.
It depends on what you think war with Red China would be, a local war, or a massive war between Communist China and its allies against Western Civilization, the Philippines, Taiwan Australia, Japan, and possibly other Asian countries like Vietnam, and involving India and Pakistan.
War with Red China just might be an all-encompassing war fought until some major world issues are settled and China is set back for generations.
By the way, the way you cut out that artificial quote makes it sound like I said something that I didn’t.
The actual statement was “”However or whoever or whenever the West fights China, it will need NATO and the American military better prepared, and better armed, with a reinvigorated weapons-producing West and greater awareness and unity on military issues, and a lessened Russian threat.””
Agreed. My impression is they argue like typical Democrats, which is to say, they'll throw whatever cr*p they can scoop up against the wall, just to see what sticks.
So, in this example, if we send Ukraine our old stuff, then "OMG, we're running out of weapons & ammo".
Then, when we ramp up to build more, OMG, we'll never catch up, all is lost, we're doomed, run for the hills!".
Like modern day Denethors,
I'd be near certain you'd see that same "lag" on the Russian side when it came to their retreats from Kiev, Kharkiv and Kherson.
But I'm not certain that the exact position of trench lines, which don't change much in weeks or months, is all that critical.
What would be highly important are numbers -- of troops, weapons & casualties -- on both sides but, of course, we will never know those reliably until it becomes history, as opposed to current events.
delta7: "As stated , we can see Bakmut is all but steamrolled, Avidivka next, high Russian priority to stop the Ukie artillery that has shelled Donetsk since 2015."
It's curious, isn't it, how a propagandist will often use his own worst crimes to accuse his opponents of those very crimes?
So, let's see... if it's true that Russians are wildly enthusiastic about invading and destroying Ukraine, then is it untrue, right? that:
Oh, really? That's pretty amazing, when you consider that:
So let's add them up: Russia 146 million people, maybe $5 trillion GDP.
US and our allies: 1.152 billion people, $63 trillion in GDP.
So, we outnumber Russians eight to one in populations and twelve to one in GDPs.
So who, exactly, do you think is going to bleed whom dry?
Oh? So now you spring your BIG SURPRISE on us -- the Xi-snake's China will turn the balance of power in Russia's favor, right?
Well... Russia and China together have 1.558 billion people with $35 trillion in PPP GDP.
So, now it's a closer match, though US/Allies GDP is still 80% more than China/Russia according to PPP estimates.
If we go by nominal numbers, then we are three times the combined China/Russia GDP.
And if China/Russia do become dominant, then what will happen with other large countries which today try to remain neutral & friendly to all?
Total of major "neutral" countries: 2.137 billion people, $23.4 trillion GDP.
Plus there's this -- in addition to the US allies we'd expect to support Ukraine, there are at least ten others, perhaps surprising supporters of Ukraine, in alphabetical order:
This map shows how each country responded to the war in Ukraine.
Nonsense, and that's the best you've got?
You're going to throw names at me and call it a day?
You have no arguments, you have no facts, so all you can do is blast me with names?
You know, don't you, that's typical of Democrats.
Conservatives, Republicans usually try to make sense, present relevant facts, make logical arguments, usually try to avoid name-calling.
But who knows, maybe something about being pro-Russia brings out the worst in some people?
Your pal is wrong
Serious control of Bakhmut proper and it’s arteries of travel is pretty recent
Not from three months ago
As I understand it now from telegram orgs is that only sparse exposed open field escape to the due west is all that’s left to pockets of Uke resistance now
Muddy fields
I also read one channel claiming some safe passage to leave was offered to some youth platoons
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.