I would suggest this....if you said this was a animal-to-human transmission from a real wet-market, then just about all of China would have shut down virtually every single wet-market within weeks. It would have been the total end of the traditional market (going back over 2,000 years).
Yet, you didn’t see the public react in that way. Traditional Chinese simply didn’t believe the BS-story and continued on with the wet-market tradition.
Logically, this suggestive story (even carried on by US scientists/doctors)....has zero proof.
1. All we need to know about COVID-19 is that it could have been released by humans deliberately as a germ warfare.
2. We also know, certain persons have benefited from COVID-19: the 2020 presidential election results were heavily influenced by mail-in ballots. No COVID-19; no millions of mail-in ballots.
3. We also know, COVID-19 became a pandemic just about the time we discovered the Bidens had an apparent conflict of interest in Ukraine. Unrelated coincidence? Maybe but not necessarily so - especially when we consider the above two points.
Welcome to 2020
Early on, it was known that the first people to have COVID-19
had no connection to he Wuhan Wet Market.
It became known that this ‘product’ had been developed at the
Wuhan Biolab (at least it was highly suspected, and I believe
confirmed at times).
Fauci was found to have sent funding to develop change of
function upgrades to viruses. He still denies to this day
that was what was happening. It seems he was lying.
This calls to question how he downgraded the possibility
that the virus came from the above lab. I’m not sure if
he put pressure on any person or entity, to keep the Wet
Market theory active.
So now he’s headed off to work his magic elsewhere.
Must be nice to be untouchable.