To: ClearCase_guy
But NATO has basically attacked Russia... We’re not the Good Guys Right, show exactly how NATO "basically attacked Russia". Nonsense
11 posted on
04/05/2023 6:18:01 AM PDT by
tlozo
(Better to Die on Your Feet than Live on Your Knees )
To: tlozo
Here's a picture of one of the thousands of Soviet SAMs in North Vietnam. Several of these killed my fellow USAF Airmen. Many of the early version were not only sold by the Soviets, but manned and run by Russian-Soviet technicians.
If that wasn't an act of war against the USA in the 1960s, then whatever the Russian are saying it is now is hyperbole.
22 posted on
04/05/2023 6:30:17 AM PDT by
Alas Babylon!
(Gov't declaring misinformation is tyranny: “Who determines what false information is?” )
To: tlozo
Right, show exactly how NATO "basically attacked Russia". The first step was clearly Russia attacking Ukraine. No question. So, "Russia started it". I do understand that.
But Ukraine is Ukraine and it is not NATO. So that initial conflict was isolated. It's Russia and Ukraine.
But currently every country in NATO is supplying money and arms and ammunition to Ukraine in order to fight the Russian military. German Leopard tanks have arrived. You have German armor tangling with Russian troops.
I understand that you don't want to see this as "NATO attacking Russia" but from where I'm sitting, this is NATO attacking Russia.
25 posted on
04/05/2023 6:33:02 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(“You want it one way, but it's the other way”)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson