Posted on 04/04/2023 1:04:21 PM PDT by cotton1706
Counts are AFTER Trump was sworn in as President, when he was running the country, not his business.
What a joke.
(Excerpt) Read more at manhattanda.org ...
Valid or not, he did get arrested before Hillary... sad state of things.
What about statute of limitations? I thought the extension of the statute of limitations for that person being outside the jurisdiction is for people fleeing? Trump did not flee, and everyone knew where he was.
“Falsifying Business Records” x 34
That’s their felony charge.
Oh shut up. This ain’t going to help DeSantis so cut it out.
Are you orgasming yet?
Apparently if the subject has been out of the jurisdiction of the court that the time absent is added to the time allowed to bring Federal charges.
This is a damn joke.
It’s all the same thing twisted 34 different ways.
Trump was elected President before Hitlery...MAGA!
Get help, dude
As of 2017, there was no underlying act of Trump that needed to be concealed from anybody except his wife.
From the Tom Delay playbook.
I was worried before I read it.
Not any more.
He said she said with Michael Cohen as the State of New York’s witness for the prosecution.
34 counts with each count being a separate invoice, check or general ledger entry. What an unmitigated crap storm this is.
NINTH COUNT:
AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses the
defendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE,
in violation of Penal Law ยง175.10, committed as follows:
The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about June 19, 2017, with
intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof,
made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry in the Detail
General Ledger for Donald J. Trump, bearing voucher number 858770, and kept and maintained
by the Trump Organization
There must be “intent to defraud”.
Seems to me there is something huge missing in all 34 counts - the "crime" referred to in the indictment is not identified at all. A defendant cannot defend against an unknown charge. This indictment is a massive deprivation of due process of law. You are entitled as of right to know what you are accused of. This indictment DOES NOT DO THAT. MOVE TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT. IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY VAGUE AND AMBIGUOUS.
2017? Seems to me that was some time ago. Obviously I guess the crime he was allegedly doing was hiding the bimbo payoff?
Unless there is a superceeding indictment, if this is it, it is nothing but BS.
A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.
The important issue here is what crime is he covering up. If it is that BS voting law violation, it was ruled already.
Remember, they didn’t get Martha Stewart for insider trading.
They got her for “lying to investigators”. What was the “lie”? Denying that she had engaged in insider trading.
That’s messed up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.