To: nickcarraway
That is not right. I sure don’t defend him if he killed those youth, but if his sisters had nothing to do with it at all, why terminate them? Is that legal?
6 posted on
03/28/2023 8:39:47 PM PDT by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
I’m with you on this one... the sisters had nothing to do with the crime...
8 posted on
03/28/2023 8:42:23 PM PDT by
GOPJ
(When Morning Joe's sycophants say "My Democracy" it sounds like Gollum saying "my precious")
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin; jimwatx; GOPJ
We’re descending into a complete abrogation of the Constitution.
10 posted on
03/28/2023 8:49:25 PM PDT by
kiryandil
(China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Are they working in an at will state?
12 posted on
03/28/2023 8:54:31 PM PDT by
Jonty30
(It is not how many that go into Mexico that counts. It is how many that return from Mexico.)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Legal probably.
Right.... eh. There are people who went Guano Crazy (that is technical jargon for totally kook-koo) over this murder. So their being employed at a certain place could result in people showing up and interrupting the business. It could even put the other employees in danger.
So I can understand why they did it even if I am not convinced it is right.
16 posted on
03/28/2023 9:26:53 PM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
("EATING... BABIES.... IS NOT.... COOL!" -Rath)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson