[AndyTheBear]

It was in post 33 you first modified the traditional definition to include 100% with your dishonest challenge:

You said:

Please identify three ‘vaccines’ that produced ‘immunity’ where ‘immunity’ is 100% protection from infection.

I did not take the bate because I did not modify the definition like you did to mean 100%.

So you are proven wrong again...by just a tiny bit of effort. Maybe its time for you to maybe start being honest finally?

[DugwayDuke]

AndyTheBear wrote: “I did not take the bate because I did not modify the definition like you did to mean 100%.”

Do you agree with this claim often made by vaccine skeptics: “These can’t be vaccines because you can take the vaccine and still catch the disease”.